From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Cc: will@kernel.org, yury.norov@gmail.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com,
yangyicong@hisilicon.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] perf/arm-cmn: Avoid placing cpumask var on stack
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 15:23:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg1mXESq2BP8B0yz@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403125109.2054881-4-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 08:51:02PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote:
> For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask
> variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack
> overflow.
>
> Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate
> cpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to
> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.
>
> But dynamic allocation in cpuhp's teardown callback is somewhat problematic
> for if allocation fails(which is unlikely but still possible):
> - If -ENOMEM is returned to caller, kernel crashes for non-bringup
> teardown;
> - If callback pretends nothing happened and returns 0 to caller, it may
> trap system into an in-consisitent/compromised state;
>
> Use newly-introduced cpumask_any_and_but() to address all issues above.
> It eliminates usage of temporary cpumask var in generic way, no matter how
> the cpumask var is allocated.
>
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
The logic looks good to me, but I'd like the commit message updated the same as
per my comment on patch 2.
With that commit message:
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> index 7ef9c7e4836b..6bfb0c4a1287 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> @@ -1950,20 +1950,20 @@ static int arm_cmn_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *cpuhp_no
> struct arm_cmn *cmn;
> unsigned int target;
> int node;
> - cpumask_t mask;
>
> cmn = hlist_entry_safe(cpuhp_node, struct arm_cmn, cpuhp_node);
> if (cpu != cmn->cpu)
> return 0;
>
> node = dev_to_node(cmn->dev);
> - if (cpumask_and(&mask, cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask) &&
> - cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, cpumask_of(cpu)))
> - target = cpumask_any(&mask);
> - else
> +
> + target = cpumask_any_and_but(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask, cpu);
> + if (target >= nr_cpu_ids)
> target = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu);
> +
> if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
> arm_cmn_migrate(cmn, target);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-03 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 12:50 [PATCH v2 00/10] perf: Avoid placing cpumask var on stack Dawei Li
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] cpumask: add cpumask_any_and_but() Dawei Li
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] perf/alibaba_uncore_drw: Avoid placing cpumask var on stack Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:16 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] perf/arm-cmn: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:23 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] perf/arm_cspmu: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:21 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] perf/arm_dsu: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:32 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] perf/dwc_pcie: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:33 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] perf/hisi_pcie: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:35 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-05 9:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] perf/hisi_uncore: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:35 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-05 9:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] perf/qcom_l2: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:36 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] perf/thunderx2: " Dawei Li
2024-04-03 14:38 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 14:41 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] perf: " Mark Rutland
2024-04-03 16:11 ` Dawei Li
2024-04-03 16:39 ` Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zg1mXESq2BP8B0yz@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=dawei.li@shingroup.cn \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox