public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mateusz K <mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: Switch over to MSI interrupts
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:24:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgLooJa1JVKEMOtf@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgLefFQanbq-ozKM@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:41:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:06:38AM +0100, Mateusz K wrote:
> > I tried the patch that changes PCI_IRQ_LEGACY into PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES
> > and it seems I get some other error now
> > 
> > [    1.477341] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
> > [    1.477466] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
> > [    1.477468] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: PCI INT A: not connected
> > [    1.477488] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: probe with driver intel-lpss
> > failed with error -2147483648
> > [    1.489572] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
> > [    1.489688] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: can't derive routing for PCI INT C
> > [    1.489689] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: PCI INT C: not connected
> > [    1.489715] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: probe with driver intel-lpss
> > failed with error -2147483648
> > [    1.501886] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
> > [    1.502034] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
> > [    1.502036] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: PCI INT A: not connected
> > [    1.502067] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: probe with driver intel-lpss
> > failed with error -2147483648
> > [    1.514288] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
> > [    1.514535] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: can't derive routing for PCI INT B
> > [    1.514538] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: PCI INT B: not connected
> > [    1.514570] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: probe with driver intel-lpss
> > failed with error -2147483648
> > [    1.526291] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
> > [    1.526555] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
> > [    1.526557] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: PCI INT A: not connected
> > [    1.526604] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.0: probe with driver intel-lpss
> > failed with error -2147483648
> > [    1.538130] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: enabling device (0004 -> 0006)
> > [    1.538233] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: can't derive routing for PCI INT D
> > [    1.538235] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: PCI INT D: not connected
> > [    1.538253] intel-lpss 0000:00:1e.3: probe with driver intel-lpss
> > failed with error -2147483648
> 
> Hmm... I have a unique board to test :-)
> Let's revert it then.
> 
> Bjorn, in such case your tree should keep conversion one.
> 
> Lee, do you prefer a revert or can you simply drop this from the queue?

Hold on, but IIUC this is the report about new hardware that never had
a support by Linux before.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-26 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-12 16:59 [PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: Switch over to MSI interrupts Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-21 16:02 ` (subset) " Lee Jones
2024-03-25 21:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-03-26 10:06   ` Mateusz K
2024-03-26 14:41     ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-26 14:50       ` Mateusz K
2024-03-26 15:25         ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-26 15:24       ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-03-27 13:17         ` Lee Jones
2024-03-27 13:24           ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-27 14:12             ` Lee Jones
2024-03-27 14:23               ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-26 16:21   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-26 21:01     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-03-26 21:22       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-26 22:09         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-03-26 22:25           ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZgLooJa1JVKEMOtf@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mateusz.kaduk@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox