Re: [RISC-V] [tech-j-ext] [RFC PATCH 5/9] riscv: Split per-CPU and per-thread envcfg bits

[Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 06:58:45PM -0700, Deepak Gupta via lists.riscv.org wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 7:21 PM Samuel Holland
><samuel.holland@sifive.com> wrote:
>>
>> >         else
>> >                 regs->status |= SR_UXL_64;
>> >  #endif
>> > +       current->thread_info.envcfg = ENVCFG_BASE;
>> >  }
>> >
>> > And instead of context switching in `_switch_to`,
>> > In `entry.S` pick up `envcfg` from `thread_info` and write it into CSR.
>>
>> The immediate reason is that writing envcfg in ret_from_exception() adds cycles
>> to every IRQ and system call exit, even though most of them will not change the
>> envcfg value. This is especially the case when returning from an IRQ/exception
>> back to S-mode, since envcfg has zero effect there.
>>
>
>A quick observation:
>So I tried this on my setup. When I put `senvcfg` writes in
>`__switch_to ` path, qemu suddenly
>just tanks and takes a lot of time to boot up as opposed to when
>`senvcfg` was in trap return path.
>In my case entire userspace (all processes) have cfi enabled for them
>via `senvcfg` and it gets
>context switched. Not sure it's specific to my setup. I don't think it
>should be an issue on actual
>hardware.
>
>Still debugging why it slows down my qemu drastically when same writes
>to same CSR
>are moved from `ret_from_exception` to `switch_to`

Nevermind and sorry for the bother. An issue on my setup.

>
>
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>View/Reply Online (#680): https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-j-ext/message/680
>Mute This Topic: https://lists.riscv.org/mt/105033914/7300952
>Group Owner: tech-j-ext+owner@lists.riscv.org
>Unsubscribe: https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-j-ext/unsub [debug@rivosinc.com]
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>