From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Cc: "Viresh Kumar" <vireshk@kernel.org>,
"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: dw: Simplify max-burst calculation procedure
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 22:11:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh7NfmffgSBSjVWv@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240416162908.24180-5-fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 07:28:58PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> In order to have a more coherent DW AHB DMA slave configuration method
> let's simplify the source and destination channel max-burst calculation
> procedure:
>
> 1. Create the max-burst verification method as it has been just done for
> the memory and peripheral address widths. Thus the DWC DMA slave config
dwc_config() method
?
> method will turn to a set of the verification methods execution.
>
> 2. Since both the generic DW AHB DMA and Intel DMA32 engines support the
"i" in iDMA 32-bit stands for "integrated", so 'Intel iDMA 32-bit'
> power-of-2 bursts only, then the specified by the client driver max-burst
> values can be converted to being power-of-2 right in the max-burst
> verification method.
>
> 3. Since max-burst encoded value is required on the CTL_LO fields
> calculation stage, the encode_maxburst() callback can be easily dropped
> from the dw_dma structure meanwhile the encoding procedure will be
> executed right in the CTL_LO register value calculation.
>
> Thus the update will provide the next positive effects: the internal
> DMA-slave config structure will contain only the real DMA-transfer config
> value, which will be encoded to the DMA-controller register fields only
> when it's required on the buffer mapping; the redundant encode_maxburst()
> callback will be dropped simplifying the internal HW-abstraction API;
> DWC-config method will look more readable executing the verification
dwc_config() method
?
> functions one-by-one.
...
> +static void dwc_verify_maxburst(struct dma_chan *chan)
It's inconsistent to the rest of _verify methods. It doesn't verify as it
doesn't return anything. Make it int or rename the function.
> +{
> + struct dw_dma_chan *dwc = to_dw_dma_chan(chan);
> +
> + dwc->dma_sconfig.src_maxburst =
> + clamp(dwc->dma_sconfig.src_maxburst, 1U, dwc->max_burst);
> + dwc->dma_sconfig.dst_maxburst =
> + clamp(dwc->dma_sconfig.dst_maxburst, 1U, dwc->max_burst);
> +
> + dwc->dma_sconfig.src_maxburst =
> + rounddown_pow_of_two(dwc->dma_sconfig.src_maxburst);
> + dwc->dma_sconfig.dst_maxburst =
> + rounddown_pow_of_two(dwc->dma_sconfig.dst_maxburst);
> +}
...
> static int dwc_verify_p_buswidth(struct dma_chan *chan)
> - reg_burst = rounddown_pow_of_two(dwc->dma_sconfig.src_maxburst);
> + reg_burst = dwc->dma_sconfig.src_maxburst;
Seems you have a dependency, need a comment below that maxburst has to be
"verified" [whatever] first.
...
> +static inline u8 dw_dma_encode_maxburst(u32 maxburst)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Fix burst size according to dw_dmac. We need to convert them as:
> + * 1 -> 0, 4 -> 1, 8 -> 2, 16 -> 3.
> + */
> + return maxburst > 1 ? fls(maxburst) - 2 : 0;
> +}
Split these moves to another preparatory patch.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-16 16:28 [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: dw: Fix src/dst addr width misconfig Serge Semin
2024-04-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: dw: Add peripheral bus width verification Serge Semin
2024-04-16 18:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-17 19:54 ` Serge Semin
2024-04-18 9:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-18 15:47 ` Serge Semin
2024-04-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] dmaengine: dw: Add memory " Serge Semin
2024-04-16 18:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-17 17:13 ` Serge Semin
2024-04-17 17:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-17 18:52 ` Serge Semin
2024-04-18 9:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-18 15:52 ` Serge Semin
2024-04-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: dw: Simplify prepare CTL_LO methods Serge Semin
2024-04-16 19:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-17 20:11 ` Serge Semin
2024-04-18 11:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-18 19:00 ` Serge Semin
2024-04-18 21:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-19 9:19 ` Serge Semin
2024-04-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: dw: Simplify max-burst calculation procedure Serge Semin
2024-04-16 19:11 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-04-17 20:35 ` Serge Semin
2024-04-18 11:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-18 19:10 ` Serge Semin
2024-04-16 19:13 ` [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: dw: Fix src/dst addr width misconfig Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-17 17:34 ` Serge Semin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zh7NfmffgSBSjVWv@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox