From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bmailout3.hostsharing.net (bmailout3.hostsharing.net [176.9.242.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F91E848E; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 21:28:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=176.9.242.62 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712525310; cv=none; b=QH+6Xih95+3VmsEb3Szr3YAXFWm1KIIt4eNFZYXs/+iwXtKJa/v+QX+BFYx7C44UvwcBuR6qCFp2KIOy58X/MHzoUJuGLiKXdfiF3H+OTnGn3v/XwFPq+N5nvvdk38BVHTGpmQZEFZFy0aKjB+lu2UkVCJE+JyxDddNmwENerls= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712525310; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k5M/CSvk/88H2bpt2CNd87p3/5oo8+vxSyFdr9mJmIM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YTAjTxWzGNPS4JpmMyZgrXbLUbWG1GPSJqMTfDVFnUbgeo09T4PapYIJDtovfYkLkPRD+CNhTYdWOEP9adJWN5euuxWlyp1GlVSUNMofNsI/NHeaui2v0fmbV3Jx03iHhTa9t0XG3RuGayVC3f74M/SXOG51kUqWGq4U2qWBf+k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=176.9.242.62 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net Received: from h08.hostsharing.net (h08.hostsharing.net [IPv6:2a01:37:1000::53df:5f1c:0]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.hostsharing.net", Issuer "RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1" (verified OK)) by bmailout3.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB1D100DA1AC; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:28:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by h08.hostsharing.net (Postfix, from userid 100393) id 9F0CB517537; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:28:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:28:24 +0200 From: Lukas Wunner To: ppwaskie@kernel.org Cc: Dan Williams , linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cxl/acpi.c: Add buggy BIOS hint for CXL ACPI lookup failure Message-ID: References: <20240407210526.8500-1-ppwaskie@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240407210526.8500-1-ppwaskie@kernel.org> On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 02:05:26PM -0700, ppwaskie@kernel.org wrote: > --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c > @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static int cxl_get_chbs(struct device *dev, struct acpi_device *hb, > > rc = acpi_evaluate_integer(hb->handle, METHOD_NAME__UID, NULL, &uid); > if (rc != AE_OK) { > - dev_err(dev, "unable to retrieve _UID\n"); > + dev_err(dev, "unable to retrieve _UID. Potentially buggy BIOS\n"); > return -ENOENT; > } dev_err(dev, FW_BUG "unable to retrieve _UID\n"); ^^^^^^ There's a macro for that.