From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
linuxarm@huawei.com, linux@roeck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/cpu/topology: don't write to immutable cpu_present_mask
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:42:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhT/ZTdRN+Gxfe8S@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ttkc6kwx.ffs@tglx>
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07 2024 at 18:26, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Workaround the following oops:
> >
> > topology_hotplug_apic
> > topo_set_cpuids
> > set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
> > // write to __ro_after_init section after init
>
> Duh, yes.
>
> > adobriyan: I'm not sure what's going on, can it set unset bit here?
> > If not, then why does it repeat the job and set already set bits.
> >
> > Anyhow, let's not oops peoples' machines for now.
>
> Adding a bandaid to paper over the non-understood real problem is
> definitely not a good plan. I take this patch as a bug report.
>
> Proper fix below.
BTW., independently of the fix, warning about a too late set_cpu_possible()
might still make sense - clearly it *can* be called too late by
architecture init code :-)
It's not a performance-sensitive function in any case, so the extra
debugging code might not hurt.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-09 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-07 15:26 [PATCH 1/2] x86/cpu/topology: don't write to immutable cpu_present_mask Alexey Dobriyan
2024-04-08 13:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-09 8:42 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2024-04-09 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-10 13:33 ` [tip: x86/alternatives] x86/topology: Don't update cpu_possible_map in topo_set_cpuids() tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 13:41 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZhT/ZTdRN+Gxfe8S@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox