From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B014152DE7; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713797043; cv=none; b=sNRjEf5GBNZnszqQTjqnat2nr0Xi8HSwuyUSTONGPZl2zplbmSut7cUOfWhyETHX/0WMIm+mDZywxr+bFORUljA92Wm6xR8pEyVGUGK3r5VVXcbM+/BvgFFrCCx9qvxYuvst2RzpbcK19kuMWp3v8Mw8AWURxbxNrxwDKI8AT/w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713797043; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gBUYWauvGv9ThwhZ6oDCve7DncumHaHE1b9MyIXYKWs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=l/6C5lXupHErq6hxo1baWEd1OBYfaBEVwJVbOsi+ZN37alXl+j8y/btwlmlx9ni70ObfR/TKIXdFtLO8eq6EONaUi848eWnNkOyEdQHTanzTawlcIeRbhUt8rfeC2o3HahvjK+hjpTEZs3kMegh815T5Xlnxe2UkfHwc8GOGc2A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 99VZ6J5RT1q57oJ/TtxaXQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: l8LVkdIRSYi7K69C9TEbJA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11052"; a="9506523" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,220,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="9506523" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2024 07:44:01 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: sCyeB4r8Rx6Pf/2ZUlJ3ZQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MGbSjyz2SImN99WrHP67pQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,220,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="28851989" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2024 07:43:56 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1ryutc-000000005cN-1VZv; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:43:52 +0300 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:43:51 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Konstantin P." Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , lkp@intel.com, Vladimir Zapolskiy , Rob Herring , jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, manikanta.guntupalli@amd.com, corbet@lwn.net, ychuang3@nuvoton.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, Maarten.Brock@sttls.nl, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Hugo Villeneuve , Lech Perczak , Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] add support for EXAR XR20M1172 UART Message-ID: References: <20240422133219.2710061-1-ria.freelander@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:30:13PM +0300, Konstantin P. wrote: > I do not skip it, it added to patch 2, as you requested. You still continue top-posting! It's not good. You missed _my_ tag. But please, please, wait a bit, you really need to slow down. > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 16:51 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 22/04/2024 15:50, Konstantin P. wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 4:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski > > wrote: > > >> On 22/04/2024 15:32, Konstantin Pugin wrote: > > >>> EXAR XR20M1172 UART is mostly SC16IS762-compatible, but > > >>> it has additional register which can change UART multiplier > > >>> to 4x and 8x, similar to UPF_MAGIC_MULTIPLIER does. So, I used this > > >>> flag to guard access to its specific DLD register. It seems than > > >>> other EXAR SPI UART modules also have this register, but I tested > > >>> only XR20M1172. > > >>> Yes, in datasheet this register is called "DLD - Divisor Fractional" > > >>> or "DLD - Divisor Fractional Register", calling depends on datasheet > > >>> version. > > >>> > > >>> I am sorry about too many submissions and top post reply. About second > > - > > >>> I do not know how to reply properly to this ML from GMail phone app. > > About first - I just > > >>> get very good feedback from Andy Shevchenko, and want to fix his > > review picks ASAP. > > >>> > > >> > > >> One patchset per 24h. > > >> > > >> Plus, you already got such review comment: > > >> > > >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > > >> > > >> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. > > >> > > >> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: > > >> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new > > >> versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when > > >> provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 > > >> can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add > > >> the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the > > >> version they apply. > > >> > > >> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 > > >> > > >> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. > > >> > > >> Just start using b4. > > > > > > There is not only for tag. I submit fixes for version 4 by mistake, > > > so, repost to 7 was necessary, because v6 was not work (as v4). But v7 > > > should be based on v5, and v5 is tested better around tty-next. > > > > ??? > > > > You got tag, didn't you? Then explain why you decided to skip it. In the > > changelog of patchset which ignores/skips the tag. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko