public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Grzeschik <mgr@pengutronix.de>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: gadget: check drained isoc ep
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:37:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zie5sN473m2rgNTK@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404002906.wk6xbz2wp2tf2xwn@synopsys.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2391 bytes --]

Hi Thinh,

On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:29:14AM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 02, 2024, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>> > My concern here is for the case where transfer_in_flight == true and
>>
>> I mean transfer_in_flight == false
>>
>> > list_empty(started_list) == false. That means that the requests in the
>> > started_list are completed but are not given back to the gadget driver.
>> >
>> > Since they remained in the started_list, they will be resubmitted again
>> > on the next usb_ep_queue. We may send duplicate transfers right?
>
>Actually, since the requests are completed, the HWO bits are cleared,
>nothing is submitted and no duplicate. But since the requests are not
>given back yet from the started_list, then the next Start_Transfer
>command will begin with the TRB address of the completed request
>(HWO=0), the controller may not process the next TRBs. Have you tested
>this scenario?
>
>> >
>> > You can try to cleanup requests in the started_list, but you need to be
>> > careful to make sure you're not out of sync with the transfer completion
>> > events and new requests from gadget driver.
>> >
>
>Was the problem you encounter due to no_interrupt settings where the
>it was set to the last request of the uvc data pump?
>
>if that's the case, can UVC function driver make sure to not set
>no_interrupt to the last request of the data pump from the UVC?

Actually no. What I want to do is to ensure that the dwc3 stream
is stopped when the hardware was drained. Which is a valid point
in my case. Since we are actually potentially enqueueing new request
in the complete handler, be it zero length or real transfers.

Calling kick_transfer on an drained hw will absolutely run into
missed isocs if the irq thread was called late. We saw this on real hardware,
where another irq_thread was scheduled with the same priority as the
dwc3 irq_thread but was running so long that the HW was running dry in
between the hw irq and the actual dwc3_irq_thread run.

Michael

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-23 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-02 21:51 [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: gadget: check drained isoc ep Michael Grzeschik
2024-04-02 23:06 ` Thinh Nguyen
2024-04-02 23:18   ` Thinh Nguyen
2024-04-04  0:29     ` Thinh Nguyen
2024-04-23 13:37       ` Michael Grzeschik [this message]
2024-04-24  1:51         ` Thinh Nguyen
2024-05-04 23:44           ` Michael Grzeschik
2024-05-08 23:03             ` Thinh Nguyen
2024-05-08 23:53               ` Michael Grzeschik
2024-05-11  0:51                 ` Thinh Nguyen
2024-05-12 21:33                   ` Michael Grzeschik
2024-05-17  1:29                     ` Thinh Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zie5sN473m2rgNTK@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mgr@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox