From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: Explicitly zero kvm_caps during vendor module load
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 08:33:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZikmVzsvV-tt_pSs@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e3ad8fa55a26d8726ef0b68e40f59cbcdac1f6c.camel@intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 09:53 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Zero out all of kvm_caps when loading a new vendor module to ensure that
> > KVM can't inadvertently rely on global initialization of a field, and add
> > a comment above the definition of kvm_caps to call out that all fields
> > needs to be explicitly computed during vendor module load.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 44ce187bad89..8f3979d5fc80 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -92,6 +92,11 @@
> > #define MAX_IO_MSRS 256
> > #define KVM_MAX_MCE_BANKS 32
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Note, kvm_caps fields should *never* have default values, all fields must be
> > + * recomputed from scratch during vendor module load, e.g. to account for a
> > + * vendor module being reloaded with different module parameters.
> > + */
> > struct kvm_caps kvm_caps __read_mostly;
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_caps);
> >
> > @@ -9755,6 +9760,8 @@ int kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
> > return -EIO;
> > }
> >
> > + memset(&kvm_caps, 0, sizeof(kvm_caps));
> > +
> > x86_emulator_cache = kvm_alloc_emulator_cache();
> > if (!x86_emulator_cache) {
> > pr_err("failed to allocate cache for x86 emulator\n");
>
> Why do the memset() here particularly?
So that it happens as early as possible, e.g. in case kvm_mmu_vendor_module_init()
or some other function comes along and modifies kvm_caps.
> Isn't it better to put ...
>
> memset(&kvm_caps, 0, sizeof(kvm_caps));
> kvm_caps.supported_vm_types = BIT(KVM_X86_DEFAULT_VM);
> kvm_caps.supported_mce_cap = MCG_CTL_P | MCG_SER_P;
>
> ... together so it can be easily seen?
>
> We can even have a helper to do above to "reset kvm_caps to default
> values" I think.
Hmm, I don't think a helper is necessary, but I do agree that having all of the
explicit initialization in one place would be better. The alternative would be
to use |= for BIT(KVM_X86_DEFAULT_VM), and MCG_CTL_P | MCG_SER_P, but I don't
think that would be an improvement. I'll tweak the first two patches to set the
hardcoded caps earlier.
The main reason I don't want to add a helper is that coming up with a name would
be tricky. E.g. "kvm_reset_caps()" isn't a great fit because the caps are "reset"
throughout module loading. "kvm_set_default_caps()" kinda fits, but they aren't
so much that they are KVM's defaults, rather they are the caps that KVM can always
support regardless of hardware support, e.g. supported_xcr0 isn't optional, it
just depends on hardware.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-23 16:53 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Fix supported VM_TYPES caps Sean Christopherson
2024-04-23 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: Fully re-initialize supported_vm_types on vendor module load Sean Christopherson
2024-04-23 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: Fully re-initialize supported_mce_cap " Sean Christopherson
2024-04-23 16:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: Explicitly zero kvm_caps during " Sean Christopherson
2024-04-24 3:25 ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-24 15:33 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-04-25 10:07 ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-25 13:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Fix supported VM_TYPES caps Xiaoyao Li
2024-04-25 14:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-26 1:17 ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-26 15:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-29 2:45 ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-29 15:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-07 17:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 17:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-10 14:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZikmVzsvV-tt_pSs@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox