Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: ektf2127 - add ektf2232 support

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>]

On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 10:16:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 9:58 PM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> wrote:
> >
> > The chip is similar, but has status bits at different positions,
> > so use the correct bits.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +       if (ts->shifted_status) {

Instead of the flag I think it would be better if you had
ts->status_shift and did

		status = buf[7] >> ts->status_shift;
		ektf2127_report2_contact(ts, 0, &buf[1], status & BIT(0));
		ektf2127_report2_contact(ts, 1, &buf[4], status & BIT(1));

> > +               ektf2127_report2_contact(ts, 0, &buf[1], !!(buf[7] & 1));
> > +               ektf2127_report2_contact(ts, 1, &buf[4], !!(buf[7] & 2));
> 
> BIT(0)
> BIT(1)
> 
> > +       } else {
> > +               ektf2127_report2_contact(ts, 0, &buf[1], !!(buf[7] & 2));
> > +               ektf2127_report2_contact(ts, 1, &buf[4], !!(buf[7] & 4));
> 
> BIT(1)
> BIT(2)
> 
> > +       }
> 
> ...
> 
> > +       if (dev->of_node &&
> > +           of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "elan,ektf2232"))
> 
> if (device_is_compatible(...))

Actually I think this better come from data obtained via
device_get_match_data().

> 
> > +               ts->shifted_status = true;
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry