From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [78.32.30.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5178F132816; Wed, 8 May 2024 22:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.32.30.218 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715207378; cv=none; b=NSPc7gN0fuS6Kjga9jVZC0b/cgLakxoSc9LU5BQdUYErqtSgYkh845gpa+FCwsBMpEp7IBf5+7W62GDxdAx4MztPuppfKeYZcoEC/oSNe8UqWMfUObignInI1TAI/DgiOt2fgY6k/JMfkmVPpzlQ4jfBGCMHMSIEfg0McaMyrf0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715207378; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8CFE89KQ1YCyvoNxJkTNQ2HS3pGySrvPKIrTF4hkP6Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MJHJ8C3UlIDOPdkfrhRTd4gdwKKCCUJXFXagB/A6MOkQKNxHQiJIsc058zFU4qPI1bOWlIviusRO7lHweh1eP9tkXpWTEhZrSD6BFuSQ7CedmoTo9f4ihL2polrt4jHIRtGlMMYz3UYfLM2rG2p9YH4GIW5SJu5pV+wiCKd6Uqo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b=FEtckNfX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.32.30.218 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="FEtckNfX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Eb6h6lYO2Xj8IhPPKAoLKWE2vlA1ySJ+zUASlEJjoTU=; b=FEtckNfXCagMhx2pYvdo/RZKvJ p+XTKA9wWiv4JnepfK8na49y4qvgRBuV6gu5VwTbHIpxtKv11fbkIu7CX4pNltuQG/kZ/9PDV9+RY Pr9J9yyKsf91exZwtiK/iCuSFt8RoyQEQbBCpTT5NGnLlKv5RFuhq9b5DJxE0T2kt9037o8S9a7qs zrVodNGW4wdEeB2S+N4Bx/2ZOhH44sveIZxPly0jFcPNMz7WbqGOXLf6/uOAs9pW1SVOa2fL4dXWE kcXbOhFdYl7bUh0HLakR2Kdqn9TYuUehFv6e/eVHGZTvHg1MqQ331GwS2qHKP6gCpk+u5EsCsIbMD yTWc6/Rw==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:48902) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s4pmv-0005h2-1q; Wed, 08 May 2024 23:29:25 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s4pmu-0001hI-UL; Wed, 08 May 2024 23:29:24 +0100 Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 23:29:24 +0100 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: Sam Protsenko Cc: Stephen Boyd , Arnd Bergmann , Linux ARM , Naresh Kamboju , linux-clk , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, open list , Anders Roxell , Dan Carpenter , Michael Turquette , Marek Szyprowski Subject: Re: clkdev: report over-sized strings when creating clkdev entries Message-ID: References: <11be44d3-0f32-49c6-b4ae-ba97a9f97763@app.fastmail.com> <820ddc2ec70780ae1ecd3af864dc8bd6.sboyd@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Russell King (Oracle) On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 04:07:57PM -0500, Sam Protsenko wrote: > The patch [1] ("clk: samsung: Don't register clkdev lookup for the > fixed rate clocks") fixes those. I think both have to be applied ASAP. > In case of E850-96, I guess [1] is more critical. The fixes to clkdev.c have been pushed out for a while now, so I think you may need to update your tree. There's been one more fix to it more recently (because of the whole va_copy() debacle). Whether linux-next picks up the latest version depends when they pull in relation to me pushing the changes out, which can take 48 hours due to the timezone differences. linux-next tends not to pick stuff up quickly if one's in the UK and pushes stuff out in the late afternoon/evening. That said, the NULL fix has been pushed out for a few days now. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!