From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Nícolas F. R. A. Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Remove unneded check for orig_nents
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 20:46:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZkZGbz0RlUHshneC@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fccdd9a-5b97-4dc6-a6b1-ce2d9e0819bd@notapiano>
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:25:19PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 04:25:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:18:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:09:33PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:10:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > Both dma_unmap_sgtable() and sg_free_table() in spi_unmap_buf_attrs()
> > > > > have checks for orig_nents against 0. No need to duplicate this.
> > > > > All the same applies to other DMA mapping API calls.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also note, there is no other user in the kernel that does this kind of
> > > > > checks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > this commit caused a regression which I reported here:
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/d3679496-2e4e-4a7c-97ed-f193bd53af1d@notapiano
> > > >
> > > > along with some thoughts on the cause and a possible solution, though I'm not
> > > > familiar with this code base at all and would really appreciate any feedback you
> > > > may have.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the report and preliminary analysis!
> > > I'll look at it hopefully sooner than later.
> > >
> > > But at least what I think now is that my change revealed a problem somewhere
> > > else, because that's how DMA mapping / streaming APIs designed, it's extremely
> > > rare to check orig_nents field.
> >
> > Can you test the below patch?
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> > index b2efd4964f7c..51811f04e463 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> > @@ -1243,6 +1243,7 @@ static int __spi_map_msg(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_message *msg)
> > else
> > rx_dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> >
> > + ret = -ENOMSG;
> > list_for_each_entry(xfer, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
> > /* The sync is done before each transfer. */
> > unsigned long attrs = DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC;
> > @@ -1272,6 +1273,9 @@ static int __spi_map_msg(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_message *msg)
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > + /* No transfer has been mapped, bail out with success */
> > + if (ret)
> > + return 0;
> >
> > ctlr->cur_rx_dma_dev = rx_dev;
> > ctlr->cur_tx_dma_dev = tx_dev;
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> thank you for the patch. Unfortunately it didn't completely solve the issue. Now
> the stack trace is slightly different and points at the next line:
>
> dma_sync_sgtable_for_device(rx_dev, &xfer->rx_sg, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>
> So now we're hitting the case where only the tx buffer was DMA mapped, but the
> rx is still uninitialized, though the cur_msg_mapped flag is set to true, since
> it is shared between them. The original code checked for the initialization of
> each scatterlist individually, which is why it worked.
I was kinda expecting that, and already have another patch to try (should
applied on top):
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 51811f04e463..5c607dd21fe7 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -1258,6 +1258,8 @@ static int __spi_map_msg(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_message *msg)
attrs);
if (ret != 0)
return ret;
+ } else {
+ memset(&xfer->tx_sg, 0, sizeof(xfer->tx_sg));
}
if (xfer->rx_buf != NULL) {
@@ -1271,6 +1273,8 @@ static int __spi_map_msg(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_message *msg)
return ret;
}
+ } else {
+ memset(&xfer->rx_sg, 0, sizeof(xfer->rx_sg));
}
}
/* No transfer has been mapped, bail out with success */
If my understanding is correct, my patch revealed two issues:
- for non-mapped message at all;
- for unidirect transfers.
But I will wait for your test results to make the final conclusion.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-16 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-07 20:10 [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Remove unneded check for orig_nents Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-08 12:08 ` Mark Brown
2024-05-16 11:28 ` [PATCH] spi: Remove unneeded " Markus Elfring
2024-05-15 21:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Remove unneded " Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2024-05-16 10:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-16 13:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-16 16:25 ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2024-05-16 17:46 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-05-16 21:11 ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2024-05-17 15:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-22 10:03 ` Neil Armstrong
2024-05-22 11:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-22 11:53 ` Neil Armstrong
2024-05-22 13:18 ` Neil Armstrong
2024-05-22 14:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-22 15:12 ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2024-05-22 15:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZkZGbz0RlUHshneC@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfraprado@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox