From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: switch timespec64 fields in inode to discrete integers
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 06:23:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zkg7OCSYJ7rzv6_D@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240517-amtime-v1-1-7b804ca4be8f@kernel.org>
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:08:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> For reference (according to pahole):
>
> Before: /* size: 624, cachelines: 10, members: 53 */
> After: /* size: 616, cachelines: 10, members: 56 */
Smaller is always better, but for a meaningful improvement, we'd want
to see more. On my laptop running a Debian 6.6.15 kernel, I see:
inode_cache 11398 11475 640 25 4 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 459 459 0
so there's 25 inodes per 4 pages. Going down to 632 is still 25 per 4
pages. At 628 bytes, we get 26 per 4 pages. Ar 604 bytes, we're at 27.
And at 584 bytes, we get 28.
Of course, struct inode gets embedded in a lot of filesystem inodes.
xfs_inode 142562 142720 1024 32 8 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 4460 4460 0
ext4_inode_cache 81 81 1184 27 8 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 3 3 0
sock_inode_cache 2123 2223 832 39 8 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 57 57 0
So any of them might cross a magic boundary where we suddenly get more
objects per slab.
Not trying to diss the work you've done here, just pointing out the
limits for anyone who's trying to do something similar. Or maybe
inspire someone to do more reductions ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-18 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-18 0:08 [PATCH] fs: switch timespec64 fields in inode to discrete integers Jeff Layton
2024-05-18 5:23 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-05-18 10:48 ` Jeff Layton
2024-05-21 16:08 ` David Sterba
2024-05-18 16:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-20 10:43 ` Jan Kara
2024-05-21 14:27 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zkg7OCSYJ7rzv6_D@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox