From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: cve@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: CVE-2024-36000: mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 17:14:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zkto8rbtAUBql-78@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024052023-CVE-2024-36000-cfc4@gregkh>
Peter,
does b76b46902c2d ("mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv
uncharge") really have any security implications? I fail to see any but
UFFD is not really my area so I might be missing something very easily.
On Mon 20-05-24 11:48:36, Greg KH wrote:
> Description
> ===========
>
> In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
>
> mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge
>
> There is a recent report on UFFDIO_COPY over hugetlb:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000ee06de0616177560@google.com/
>
> 350: lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);
>
> Should be an issue in hugetlb but triggered in an userfault context, where
> it goes into the unlikely path where two threads modifying the resv map
> together. Mike has a fix in that path for resv uncharge but it looks like
> the locking criteria was overlooked: hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd()
> will update the cgroup pointer, so it requires to be called with the lock
> held.
>
> The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-36000 to this issue.
>
>
> Affected and fixed versions
> ===========================
>
> Issue introduced in 5.10 with commit 79aa925bf239 and fixed in 6.1.91 with commit 4c806333efea
> Issue introduced in 5.10 with commit 79aa925bf239 and fixed in 6.6.30 with commit f6c5d21db16a
> Issue introduced in 5.10 with commit 79aa925bf239 and fixed in 6.8.9 with commit 538faabf31e9
> Issue introduced in 5.10 with commit 79aa925bf239 and fixed in 6.9 with commit b76b46902c2d
> Issue introduced in 5.9.7 with commit f87004c0b2bd
>
> Please see https://www.kernel.org for a full list of currently supported
> kernel versions by the kernel community.
>
> Unaffected versions might change over time as fixes are backported to
> older supported kernel versions. The official CVE entry at
> https://cve.org/CVERecord/?id=CVE-2024-36000
> will be updated if fixes are backported, please check that for the most
> up to date information about this issue.
>
>
> Affected files
> ==============
>
> The file(s) affected by this issue are:
> mm/hugetlb.c
>
>
> Mitigation
> ==========
>
> The Linux kernel CVE team recommends that you update to the latest
> stable kernel version for this, and many other bugfixes. Individual
> changes are never tested alone, but rather are part of a larger kernel
> release. Cherry-picking individual commits is not recommended or
> supported by the Linux kernel community at all. If however, updating to
> the latest release is impossible, the individual changes to resolve this
> issue can be found at these commits:
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c806333efea1000a2a9620926f560ad2e1ca7cc
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6c5d21db16a0910152ec8aa9d5a7aed72694505
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/538faabf31e9c53d8c870d114846fda958a0de10
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b76b46902c2d0395488c8412e1116c2486cdfcb2
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-20 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2024052023-CVE-2024-36000-cfc4@gregkh>
2024-05-20 15:14 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-05-21 19:38 ` CVE-2024-36000: mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge Peter Xu
2024-05-23 7:30 ` Michal Hocko
2024-05-23 10:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-23 13:08 ` Michal Hocko
2024-05-23 15:42 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-14 11:48 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zkto8rbtAUBql-78@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=cve@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox