From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3930D4C66 for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 16:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716308257; cv=none; b=AVTfP/slQZOHuLmV0nqVQkwedjCF4YlVhgVqlbMkfsEVZRKB9VQDV0D0yvhexzc0/5Et41BQd152k6XXbokzTGREzAgwem161mDrlz6XEl+s+/mCBvAtzlIuMamo3+oN/34KZFQToBBRnMvf7LhRavO3RB8gYtf2ZAfcMpoPoUI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716308257; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Mp+X4n+G4e+9QIapZ3qaEU0CrBdfMJsKLNODW33+ROE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fVfg8f4QuYd57ciiFqomo1J4DO7Ka4OujephlGvXnn53Qfgo7AsFYZszVm2ERp3f0fo6ODdKPfErfNlsQ6PwMIMfGgPa8Wq+Yn98TIJzxYnkbBlYWuNAOfTnuD+WlLMA1pJS7daLQunpx6F/e1Sceu6hRyibWNNlvUaC764D6N8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2zYdvrMlTIS1fAj8yLSpqA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LWCeBn2GTO+fj129Higj0w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11078"; a="23652296" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,178,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="23652296" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2024 09:17:21 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FInIGSHkSASZXYn4LNWvgw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: P/ernt7WR92JzSqFzPwp9g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,178,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="70387499" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2024 09:17:17 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1s9SAr-00000009i16-3hrV; Tue, 21 May 2024 19:17:13 +0300 Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 19:17:13 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Tony Luck Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mjguzik@gmail.com, patches@lists.linux.dev, peterz@infradead.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, trenn@suse.de, ubizjak@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.1 16/49] x86/platform/intel-mid: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines Message-ID: References: <20240521161002.12866-1-tony.luck@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240521161002.12866-1-tony.luck@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:10:01AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote: > New CPU #defines encode vendor and family as well as model. > > N.B. Drop Haswell. CPU model 0x3C was included by mistake > in upstream code. Yep, the result looks good. Dunno if it's better to have a separate patch with proper Fixes tag. Up to you, folks. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko