public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, weirongguang@kylinos.cn,
	kanie@linux.alibaba.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Use appropriate conditions to check the hotplug controller status
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 09:53:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlBHjbmjjSEnXCMp@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240524063023.77148-1-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 02:30:23PM +0800, Bitao Hu wrote:
> The values of 'present' and 'link_active' have similar meanings:
> the value is %1 if the status is ready, and %0 if it is not. If the
> hotplug controller itself is not available, the value should be
> %-ENODEV. However, both %1 and %-ENODEV are considered true, which
> obviously does not meet expectations. 'Slot(xx): Card present' and
> 'Slot(xx): Link Up' should only be output when the value is %1.
[...]
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> @@ -276,10 +276,10 @@ void pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change(struct controller *ctrl, u32 events)
>  	case OFF_STATE:
>  		ctrl->state = POWERON_STATE;
>  		mutex_unlock(&ctrl->state_lock);
> -		if (present)
> +		if (present > 0)
>  			ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot(%s): Card present\n",
>  				  slot_name(ctrl));
> -		if (link_active)
> +		if (link_active > 0)
>  			ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot(%s): Link Up\n",
>  				  slot_name(ctrl));
>  		ctrl->request_result = pciehp_enable_slot(ctrl);

We already handle the "<= 0" case immediately above this code excerpt:

	if (present <= 0 && link_active <= 0) {
	...
	}

So neither "present" nor "link_active" can be < 0 at this point.

Hence I don't quite understand what motivates the proposed code change?

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-24  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-24  6:30 [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Use appropriate conditions to check the hotplug controller status Bitao Hu
2024-05-24  7:53 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2024-05-26 14:45   ` yaoma
2024-05-27  8:50     ` Lukas Wunner
2024-05-27  9:43       ` yaoma
2024-05-28  6:42 ` [PATCHv2] " Bitao Hu
2024-05-28 10:54   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-06-14 18:41   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-14 19:36     ` Lukas Wunner
2024-06-14 22:03       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-15 10:06         ` Lukas Wunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZlBHjbmjjSEnXCMp@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=weirongguang@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=yaoma@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox