From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F10B06EB4A; Fri, 24 May 2024 10:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716546810; cv=none; b=cKhBUJ2r7NY/8WGKn6H8orY2HLh6ejv44eBEMZ76YIEIHtNmlnx6LiKERhtlRdfLXerDn8wfN3Rbsw9RDAH/TCTw2rrV/ObJLKPOUnObMWeyxU3kpPG02QFVYeRopcwfFcIkkeWp9q2gixVfUuYZ+UiTc7T/Z/V5q0dADuQ7oCA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716546810; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VoDeTw5LAOr0YrYdBecD70KKdNMdESDhUlj9kHa+JNM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OGo/kEwXKVMUFPPU3aeXz0dt8g9QV2c8KbBQRP65kIXhjBoz9EYRDLRh2Dlg7FXnMCCndo0w27HIlRJ26VwE8QKxq3JARu611/bRVDDzOP0EUvRltsPLIfQY3fxmXf92v+Q4z7+82MgJAi0HRzSxWSAwRyqwHVMgxcgGFh7666w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=awZau41h; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=cW+Nr8dK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="awZau41h"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="cW+Nr8dK" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56DE20380; Fri, 24 May 2024 10:33:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1716546807; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jBUJs+clTevIxUQQTuz4esHassTfo+4toG/IdUx2C8E=; b=awZau41hTpcQY8GF4jlIkpQoA8+Br+7wHFwF7Z0OQmQJTWy2oThd1ymhFfrL8InvnwzFmi aU6GT+ju3vwud3qolgq4HLOHveertpLpYHtVzFu2DAZptCpZUr1q/0aJgwOdIwARxxzFzy rwDPvLJCBbpHmiyKuh2NOi/eWavo/CA= Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=cW+Nr8dK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1716546806; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jBUJs+clTevIxUQQTuz4esHassTfo+4toG/IdUx2C8E=; b=cW+Nr8dK7O099S2uOc/mARXPYJxA5iBAxMIB1j84X2Kswi5IEqmil77TY+AyVZlSjoWZzH w9leto9sfXvDQNSTmtTLpV+Nrv2QiJhs4++ArYMuYAaL12mGVywyNyQpy7hMDpXmnh0SF3 pMy/q3g6+vUENqRnQFdT8TRkEuCJV/Y= Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5C6013A82; Fri, 24 May 2024 10:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 99SiJvZsUGb7DQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 24 May 2024 10:33:26 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 12:33:22 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: cve@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones Subject: Re: CVE-2024-26650: platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device probe Message-ID: References: <20240326175007.1388794-18-lee@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.01 X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C56DE20380 X-Spam-Level: X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.01 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.com:s=susede1]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.com:s=susede1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.com:+]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.com:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,suse.com:dkim] On Tue 21-05-24 21:31:54, Michal Hocko wrote: > This patch has been reverted in upstream by 03c6284df179 ("Revert > "drm/amd/amdgpu: Fix potential ioremap() memory leaks in > amdgpu_device_init()"") and based on the changelog the CVE should be > rejected. Wait a second. I've screwed up here. I am sorry, my bad. This revert has nothing to do with CVE-2024-26650 - 5913320eb0b3 ("platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device probe"). I guess I got completely confused by the fact that the same change exists under a different commit b28ff7a7c324 ("platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device probe"). I must have mixed this with CVE-2024-35928 somehow. zhengzucheng has already pointed to that one. Sorry about that! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs