public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3, v4] x86/fpu: Remove init_task FPU state dependencies, add debugging warning for PF_KTHREAD tasks
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:48:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmF34YbJPrV7WQzn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZmFziN0i10sILaIo@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> I changed the debug check to test for PF_KTHREAD, and to return NULL:
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU
> +struct fpu *x86_task_fpu(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return (void *)task + sizeof(*task);
> +}
> +#endif
> 
> ... and the NULL we return will likely crash & exit any kthreads attempting 
> to use the FPU context area - which I think is preferable to returning 
> invalid memory that may then be corrupted.
> 
> Hopefully this remains a hypothethical concern. :-)
> 
> Alternatively, this may be one of the very few cases where a BUG_ON() might 
> be justified? This condition is not recoverable in any sane fashion IMO.

And promptly this triggered in live testing, because while kthreads do not 
use the FPU context area, the current fpu__drop() code does call 
x86_task_cpu() even for kthreads...

See the two new 4/3 and 5/3 patches in this thread I've sent that clean 
this up:

  [PATCH 4/3] x86/fpu: Push 'fpu' pointer calculation into the fpu__drop() call
  [PATCH 5/3] x86/fpu: Make sure x86_task_fpu() doesn't get called for PF_KTHREAD tasks during exit

I'll also reorder the patches to apply these fpu__drop() changes before 
adding the debug warning.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-06  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-05  8:35 [PATCH 0/3, v3] x86/fpu: Remove the thread::fpu pointer Ingo Molnar
2024-06-05  8:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/fpu: Make task_struct::thread constant size Ingo Molnar
2024-06-05 19:04   ` Chang S. Bae
2024-06-06  9:30     ` [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix stale comment in ex_handler_fprestore() Ingo Molnar
2024-06-06 15:55       ` Chang S. Bae
2024-06-05  8:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/fpu: Remove the thread::fpu pointer Ingo Molnar
2024-06-05 13:38   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-06  8:53     ` Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08  6:55       ` Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08  7:26         ` Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08 10:10           ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-25  5:26   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-25 13:45     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-05  8:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/fpu: Remove init_task FPU state dependencies, add debugging warning Ingo Molnar
2024-06-05 14:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-05 16:08     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-05 16:26       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-05 17:28         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-06  8:30           ` [PATCH 3/3, v4] x86/fpu: Remove init_task FPU state dependencies, add debugging warning for PF_KTHREAD tasks Ingo Molnar
2024-06-06  8:46             ` [PATCH 4/3] x86/fpu: Push 'fpu' pointer calculation into the fpu__drop() call Ingo Molnar
2024-06-06  8:47             ` [PATCH 5/3] x86/fpu: Make sure x86_task_fpu() doesn't get called for PF_KTHREAD tasks during exit Ingo Molnar
2024-06-06  8:48             ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2024-06-06 12:00             ` [PATCH 3/3, v4] x86/fpu: Remove init_task FPU state dependencies, add debugging warning for PF_KTHREAD tasks Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-07 10:56               ` Ingo Molnar
2024-06-24  6:47   ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/fpu: Remove init_task FPU state dependencies, add debugging warning Ning, Hongyu
2024-06-27  3:50     ` Ning, Hongyu
2024-06-05 21:21 ` [PATCH 0/3, v3] x86/fpu: Remove the thread::fpu pointer Brian Gerst
2024-06-06  9:06   ` [PATCH] x86/fpu: Introduce the x86_task_fpu() helper method Ingo Molnar
2024-06-06 15:35     ` Brian Gerst
2024-06-07 11:38       ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZmF34YbJPrV7WQzn@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox