From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8CBD19067E; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 09:08:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718615307; cv=none; b=lKbP4qiO1vOZvKoMI9wLMITDyAUXW2+WnFhNHGHyJrVDTs1mw5Q/8SJ5+8YmoC19L9faPQE9PpfUPqdIqxUEr8KvsTPtnV6MkmO2NbUa6ukQO8Fr6x36kFh5xo58qzbsfhRl92RqhszHoVD3HwmqAtA63aASzkZB5rS08jAAck8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718615307; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A2Kts6YcthgukFSsC0XYRLdS7dysPwLYjFJ4PF+nqL8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lDdUPSUQMwkB1bI/N/xjgxzKOcUyQVweOF3ConW9sL5F63NjlrZ+LVVGT7Jxj4X6sv53xFk+gA5e8+iXRcG6KE5io002G4ctUHwbjnal8N17SRSv/BjlUMzKUPaBX+IBF2Ty9A+hS4JyOkOaJ1LfV6j/DGE7fs08mzB/j9fvZNU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CvrD59CD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CvrD59CD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A436C2BD10; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 09:08:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1718615306; bh=A2Kts6YcthgukFSsC0XYRLdS7dysPwLYjFJ4PF+nqL8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CvrD59CDWLmDgMHtEgLxDTVfR7p6QVrdrXpy8/z5uQ61iciYw/OlI5Thspk+4OA52 nBC09w+Q9v3+VgINniolM7YZLCSvOqQ9xHbGyuhXvtHf5P+FSzIJnlue0ydGco156O Tc7z0edwhMw/dhQ5vCUZrtJ1ruAWuR7zWpFDWRDSgkTtI0hw6YEhjBdnasPjpLevBa 1NKXDvlHrsQq4EaPhmh1cMs1Wq5i5LlxLUUB+vdPgT5ZUWyqRbhYyCp/v2RU95Ie5D 9WGPjS4eAfGUWliqemoZxacy8P0oLah9/mtPLlZisX7ke/nsWfqAzrl+p65shg9DeS J2GCcppqtH/jA== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJ8Lf-000000003d4-1c1O; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:08:24 +0200 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:08:23 +0200 From: Johan Hovold To: Linux regressions mailing list Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: pmic_glink: disable UCSI on sc8280xp Message-ID: References: <20240608114529.23060-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org> <50be24b4-54d6-4784-9ab9-83a90bf91a9d@leemhuis.info> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50be24b4-54d6-4784-9ab9-83a90bf91a9d@leemhuis.info> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 10:49:40AM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 17.06.24 09:56, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 01:45:29PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: > > I noticed > > that this one did not make into the regression tracker. > > FWIW, it did: > > https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/regression/lore/20240608114529.23060-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org/ > > > This > > may be related to the fact that this is the second time I'm disabling > > UCSI on sc8280xp and apparently I used the same patch Subject last time > > so they end up in the same thread on lore: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240608114529.23060-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org/ > > Kinda. The thread is not the problem. I told regzbot about the subject > for the fix a few days ago and it then dutifully looked up if a commit > with that subject ended up in next or mainline already. Which normally > is the right thing to do -- but in this case it went sideways for > obvious reasons. :-/ Not sure yet how to handle that better; maybe that > falls into the ugly category called "there are bigger fish to fry, > ignore this corner case for now". Fair enough. At least it's a known issue then. Johan