From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
"Dexuan Cui" <decui@microsoft.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Oleksandr Tyshchenko" <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"Marco Elver" <elver@google.com>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: pass meminit_context to __free_pages_core()
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:47:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmbnxrOuoarMbC6X@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13070847-4129-490c-b228-2e52bd77566a@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:38:05AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 10.06.24 06:03, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 11:09:36AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > In preparation for further changes, let's teach __free_pages_core()
> > > about the differences of memory hotplug handling.
> > >
> > > Move the memory hotplug specific handling from generic_online_page() to
> > > __free_pages_core(), use adjust_managed_page_count() on the memory
> > > hotplug path, and spell out why memory freed via memblock
> > > cannot currently use adjust_managed_page_count().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> >
> > All looks good but I am puzzled with something.
> >
> > > + } else {
> > > + /* memblock adjusts totalram_pages() ahead of time. */
> > > + atomic_long_add(nr_pages, &page_zone(page)->managed_pages);
> > > + }
> >
> > You say that memblock adjusts totalram_pages ahead of time, and I guess
> > you mean in memblock_free_all()
>
> And memblock_free_late(), which uses atomic_long_inc().
Ah yes.
> Right (it's suboptimal, but not really problematic so far. Hopefully Wei can
> clean it up and move it in here as well)
That would be great.
> For the time being
>
> "/* memblock adjusts totalram_pages() manually. */"
Yes, I think that is better ;-)
Thanks!
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-07 9:09 [PATCH v1 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: use PageOffline() instead of PageReserved() for !ZONE_DEVICE David Hildenbrand
2024-06-07 9:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: pass meminit_context to __free_pages_core() David Hildenbrand
2024-06-07 18:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-10 4:03 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-10 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-10 11:47 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-06-11 10:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-11 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
2024-06-11 19:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-12 18:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-11 19:41 ` Tim Chen
2024-06-11 19:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-07 9:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] mm/memory_hotplug: initialize memmap of !ZONE_DEVICE with PageOffline() instead of PageReserved() David Hildenbrand
2024-06-10 4:23 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-10 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-11 7:45 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 8:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-11 8:01 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-11 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2024-06-07 9:09 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mm/memory_hotplug: skip adjust_managed_page_count() for PageOffline() pages when offlining David Hildenbrand
2024-06-10 4:29 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-10 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-25 22:43 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: use PageOffline() instead of PageReserved() for !ZONE_DEVICE Andrew Morton
2024-06-26 5:01 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZmbnxrOuoarMbC6X@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).