From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCCA1AC451; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718887127; cv=none; b=M37kwUA3GZszfhmDaq1tsF2qG76a6mnaIEpEVqh9fHft60fZDTS/7tRkCCpFZrWG1mHuIm72Xkwp4ld2a3OKpZVQ5c+nLNUDfAbj8PSYRQjTTYWWbgsBGADkiJDhu6l8OaIj1EZL/D46YzorkHnHUglyZt7tgTi0Ha/kU9+O/cg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718887127; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MYZc8VcOMHW0zW/O1qd63wSKJQy0yho9ouViyflAf4c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=O+tmzWioqFXcemjTtuC1sdqwwb1zzeuuJFUSNrA44rBWKk31+iHsl+NhoX9XjR2nfVnudUniUAXJknf1VhbqZxywhkhqFEmXto77u0WUTWEUDQ+xJwjBNRdYHy6yFJPdhol7+eiyj9wEIffsHLP83K5c8rfZBBSA+LZYfoox7YU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CEBDA7; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 05:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e133380.arm.com (e133380.arm.com [10.1.197.55]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 508003F73B; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 05:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:38:39 +0100 From: Dave Martin To: Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/resctrl: Don't try to free nonexistent RMIDs Message-ID: References: <20240618140152.83154-1-Dave.Martin@arm.com> <171879092443.10875.1695191697085701044.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <20240619134522.GCZnLg8pgJq9MPHS8M@fat_crate.local> <20240619162124.GFZnMFhPW3wo2Avezo@fat_crate.local> <20240620115305.GBZnQYIex1mnXxoG-8@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240620115305.GBZnQYIex1mnXxoG-8@fat_crate.local> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 01:53:05PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:36:43PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > > I guess my issue is that the "Massage commit message" seems to document > > a criticism that the author was careless, didn't follow a rule, or that > > the commit message was defective in some way, with the author having no > > right of reply (at least, not recorded in the git history). > > Not necessarily - that's what you said. I massage commit messages because they > need some touch ups sometimes. > > In your case I rewrote the sentence with "we" because "we" is ambiguous in That _was_ unintentional, so apologies for that. > commit messages. I also broke up this biggish paragraph into smaller chunks to > make it more readable. > > > I may just be being too touchy. > > > > Anyway, thanks for picking up the patch -- I'm not trying to make extra > > work for anyone. > > I look at it this way: I don't always agree with other maintainers' choices > either but this is the reality: every maintainer has their own > requirements/views/etc on how the code and commit messages are going to look, > yadda yadda. And to some extent that's their prerogative. > > But we have a *lot* *bigger* fish to fry so I'm going to stop debating here as > everything was already said. > > Thx. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette > Ack; apologies for the noise. Cheers ---Dave