From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/pmu: Define KVM_PMC_MAX_GENERIC for platform independence
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 06:48:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnWEu13z3XOB4wjY@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b57f565-25b0-4b97-ac78-4913a8b1d225@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> >> index 6e908bdc3310..2fca247798eb 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> >> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >> int i;
> >>
> >> BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_AMD_PMC_MAX_GENERIC > AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS_CORE);
> >> - BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_AMD_PMC_MAX_GENERIC > INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC);
> >> + BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_AMD_PMC_MAX_GENERIC > KVM_PMC_MAX_GENERIC);
> >>
> >> for (i = 0; i < KVM_AMD_PMC_MAX_GENERIC ; i++) {
> >> pmu->gp_counters[i].type = KVM_PMC_GP;
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> >> index fb5cbd6cbeff..a4b0bee04596 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> >> @@ -570,6 +570,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >> struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> >> struct lbr_desc *lbr_desc = vcpu_to_lbr_desc(vcpu);
> >>
> >> + BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC > KVM_PMC_MAX_GENERIC);
> > Rather than BUILD_BUG_ON() for both Intel and AMD, can't we just do?
> >
> > #define KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS max(KVM_INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, KVM_AMD_PMC_MAX_GENERIC)
>
> Actually I tried this, but compiler would report the below error since
> KVM_PMC_MAX_GENERIC would used to define the array
> gp_counters[KVM_PMC_MAX_GENERIC];
>
> ./include/linux/minmax.h:48:50: error: braced-group within expression
> allowed only inside a function
Oh, right, the min/max macros are super fancy to deal with types. How about this
(getting there over 2-3 patches)?
I don't love the "#define MAX", but I don't see a better option. I suppose maybe
we should use __MAX or KVM_MAX since kvm_host.h is likely included outside of KVM?
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 5c0415899a07..ce0c9191eb85 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -532,13 +532,18 @@ struct kvm_pmc {
u64 current_config;
};
+#define MAX(a, b) ((a) >= (b) ? (a) : (b))
+
/* More counters may conflict with other existing Architectural MSRs */
-#define KVM_INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC 8
-#define MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR_MAX (MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 + KVM_INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC - 1)
-#define MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_MAX (MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + KVM_INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC - 1)
-#define KVM_PMC_MAX_FIXED 3
-#define MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_MAX (MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0 + KVM_PMC_MAX_FIXED - 1)
-#define KVM_AMD_PMC_MAX_GENERIC 6
+#define KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_GP_COUNTERS 8
+#define KVM_MAX_NR_AMD_GP_COUNTERS 6
+#define KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS MAX(KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_GP_COUNTERS, \
+ KVM_MAX_NR_AMD_GP_COUNTERS)
+
+#define KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_FIXED_COUTNERS 3
+#define KVM_MAX_NR_AMD_FIXED_COUTNERS 0
+#define KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS MAX(KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_FIXED_COUTNERS, \
+ KVM_MAX_NR_AMD_FIXED_COUTNERS)
struct kvm_pmu {
u8 version;
@@ -554,8 +559,8 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
u64 global_status_rsvd;
u64 reserved_bits;
u64 raw_event_mask;
- struct kvm_pmc gp_counters[KVM_INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC];
- struct kvm_pmc fixed_counters[KVM_PMC_MAX_FIXED];
+ struct kvm_pmc gp_counters[KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS];
+ struct kvm_pmc fixed_counters[KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS];
/*
* Overlay the bitmap with a 64-bit atomic so that all bits can be
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-21 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 18:21 [PATCH 0/2] KVM vPMU code refine Dapeng Mi
2024-06-19 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/pmu: Define KVM_PMC_MAX_GENERIC for platform independence Dapeng Mi
2024-06-20 16:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-21 2:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-06-21 13:48 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-06-19 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests: kvm: Reduce verbosity of "Random seed" messages Dapeng Mi
2024-06-20 18:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-21 2:51 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-06-21 13:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-26 1:57 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-06-20 16:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM vPMU code refine Sean Christopherson
2024-06-21 0:28 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnWEu13z3XOB4wjY@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=xiong.y.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox