public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Wieczor-Retman, Maciej" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"patches@lists.linux.dev" <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 07/18] x86/resctrl: Block use of mba_MBps mount option on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:24:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnWbSTY64N9_aSWA@agluck-desk3.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74ed79c1-b024-4b22-9858-14c1e5284a20@intel.com>

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 06:56:56PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 6/20/24 3:07 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > > When SNC is enabled there is a mismatch between the MBA control function
> > > > which operates at L3 cache scope and the MBM monitor functions which
> > > > measure memory bandwidth on each SNC node.
> > > > 
> > > > Block use of the mba_MBps when scopes for MBA/MBM do not match.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 4 +++-
> > > >    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> > > > index eb3bbfa96d5a..a0a43dbe011b 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> > > > @@ -2339,10 +2339,12 @@ static void mba_sc_domain_destroy(struct rdt_resource *r,
> > > >     */
> > > >    static bool supports_mba_mbps(void)
> > > >    {
> > > > +   struct rdt_resource *rmbm = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
> > > >      struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl;
> > > > 
> > > >      return (is_mbm_local_enabled() &&
> > > > -           r->alloc_capable && is_mba_linear());
> > > > +           r->alloc_capable && is_mba_linear() &&
> > > > +           r->ctrl_scope == rmbm->mon_scope);
> > > >    }
> > > > 
> > > >    /*
> > > 
> > > The function comments of supports_mba_mbps() needs an update to accompany
> > > this new requirement.
> > 
> > Will add comment on extra requirement.
> > 
> > > I also think that the "mba_MBps" mount option is now complicated enough to
> > > warrant a clear error to user space when using it fails. invalfc() is
> > > available for this and enables user space to get detailed log message
> > > from a read() on an fd created by fsopen().
> > > 
> > > Perhaps something like (please check line length and feel free to improve
> > > since as is it may quite cryptic):
> > >        rdt_parse_param(...)
> > >        {
> > > 
> > > 
> > >        ...
> > >        case Opt_mba_mbps:
> > >                if (!supports_mba_mbps())
> > >                        return invalfc(fc, "mba_MBps requires both MBM and (linear scale) MBA at L3 scope");
> > >        ...
> > >        }
> > 
> > Line length is indeed a problem (108 characters). Usual line split methods barely help as the moving the
> > string to the next line and aligning with the "(" only saves 4 characters.
> > 
> > How about this (suggestions for a shorter variable name - line is 97 characters)
> > 
> > static char mba_mbps_invalid[] = "mba_MBps requires both MBM and (linear scale) MBA at L3 scope";
> > 
> > rdt_parse_param(...)
> > {
> > 	...
> > 	case Opt_mba_mbps:
> > 		if (!supports_mba_mbps())
> > 			return invalfc(fc, mba_mbps_invalid);
> > 	...
> > }
> 
> On 6/20/24 3:12 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > static char mba_mbps_invalid[] = "mba_MBps requires both MBM and (linear scale) MBA at L3 scope";
> > 
> > checkpatch recommends "static const char ..." pushing this over 100 chars :-(
> > 
> 
> How about something like below that reaches 96:
> 
> 	case Opt_mba_mbps:
> 		if (!supports_mba_mbps())
> 			return invalfc(fc,
> 				       "mba_MBps requires both MBM and linear MBA at L3 scope");
> 

Reinette,

Alternative option. Move the messaging into supports_mba_mbps() and
split into shorter pieces for each reason. The other callers of
supports_mba_mbps() that are just re-checking status would pass
a NULL argument.

If this looks reasonable I can do it in two patches. First to add
invalfc() for the existing cases. Second to add the SNC change.

-Tony

---

static bool supports_mba_mbps(struct fs_context *fc)
{
			return invalfc(fc, mba_mbps_invalid);
	struct rdt_resource *rmbm = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl;

	if (!is_mbm_local_enabled()) {
		if (fc)
			invalfc(fc, "mba_MBps requires local MBM");
		return false;
	}
	if (!r->alloc_capable) {
		if (fc)
			invalfc(fc, "mba_MBps requires MBA");
		return false;
	}
	if (!is_mba_linear()) {
		if (fc)
			invalfc(fc, "mba_MBps requires linear MBA");
		return false;
	}
	if (r->ctrl_scope != rmbm->mon_scope) {
		if (fc)
			invalfc(fc, "mba_MBps requires MBM/MBA at L3 scope");
		return false;
	}

	return true;
}

rdt_parse_param(...)
{
	...
	case Opt_mba_mbps:
		if (!supports_mba_mbps(fc))
			return -EINVAL;
	...
}

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-21 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-10 18:35 [PATCH v20 00/18] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 01/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new domain scope Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:12   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 02/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare to split rdt_domain structure Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:13   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 03/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for different scope for control/monitor operations Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:13   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 04/18] x86/resctrl: Split the rdt_domain and rdt_hw_domain structures Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:14   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 05/18] x86/resctrl: Add node-scope to the options for feature scope Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:15   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 06/18] x86/resctrl: Introduce snc_nodes_per_l3_cache Tony Luck
2024-06-17 22:36   ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-18 22:58     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-19 14:43       ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-20 21:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 07/18] x86/resctrl: Block use of mba_MBps mount option on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:21   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-20 22:07     ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-20 22:12       ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-21  1:56       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 15:24         ` Tony Luck [this message]
2024-06-21 17:10           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 08/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:22   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 09/18] x86/resctrl: Add a new field to struct rmid_read for summation of domains Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:22   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-20 22:42     ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-21  1:59       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 16:07         ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-21 17:10           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 10/18] x86/resctrl: Refactor mkdir_mondata_subdir() with a helper function Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 11/18] x86/resctrl: Allocate a new field in union mon_data_bits Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 12/18] x86/resctrl: Create Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:30   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 13/18] x86/resctrl: Handle removing directories in Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) mode Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:30   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 14/18] x86/resctrl: Fill out rmid_read structure for smp_call*() to read a counter Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 15/18] x86/resctrl: Make __mon_event_count() handle sum domains Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 16/18] x86/resctrl: Enable RMID shared RMID mode on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:32   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 17/18] x86/resctrl: Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) detection Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:34   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 17:05   ` Markus Elfring
2024-06-21 17:14     ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-10 18:35 ` [PATCH v20 18/18] x86/resctrl: Update documentation with Sub-NUMA cluster changes Tony Luck
2024-06-20 21:35   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-13 19:17 ` [PATCH v20 00/18] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Moger, Babu
2024-06-13 20:32   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-13 21:02     ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-14 16:27     ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-14 16:46       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-14 21:29         ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-14 21:40           ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-14 22:31             ` Moger, Babu
2024-06-14 23:11           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-17 14:06             ` Moger, Babu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZnWbSTY64N9_aSWA@agluck-desk3.sc.intel.com \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox