From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFA0F9470 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 12:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719924307; cv=none; b=p747q5jAd+WJQpGbqSGWLtSbIwOXZTf2CXkQ+5gOnC/Kplx7jcP9GVpbowlWoe4aNR2eYLftV9gUtzpdCMZ+j6nmPgt9BvEK3woI9zGQrhDIEitudsF0oHG65fAT0EM8FVY/QQcXaZJ9hEK2aklc9uARuFJQzp7RPFvlNvt6uIU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719924307; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pnuX9yl56FGqRByedK9TL15vS+LxSLN3/RLNaQRaNyM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QBFYDkwk+xCU6aKn0EkBNA+73Cs3X9AQ7dtoRpELdqxORiy0NLJmLF3yKSE4P+fJvZPVq5FDJ4UYqyb9CvHSo8fJ1ODRN707vkypxjmwUlVDQ2U3KAcV8rAyglMURfwLK3wzRRcCMNvHU0ocftB92i3X1zDhCBPSrf2EqQrTw0g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=S/sJsjlr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="S/sJsjlr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07EA5C116B1; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 12:45:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719924307; bh=pnuX9yl56FGqRByedK9TL15vS+LxSLN3/RLNaQRaNyM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=S/sJsjlr2MDJ+EZ33K+iiyyYRC25e4ulxcgtRpn1yaGXVwy9+y6vQH+bVx9x/AZDt DcG/gg1oHDJHMkmOZ1ggP1kVe2+TQlYIDuifeCa/MsX89VOfgghXcSiYsK+kLQyAyC 1qy+Z+kUKKY/dGh5Z2t7zFoQvhlN/LkVUYabcX6Dp8w2+M3JGBXctkeSzRv9s1mpcP G93+8w4jIM5CAv3MYSoAFnwUfugxDGb+1EIZ3VgJBKaGAGmVP2n5RjF85lHK2HaNSJ egdZfJPviq3GS8uB/EGKlGo9RHT8o7X3jvdbZ10qHsQ6sNGrSEOZxU7Ws4W1JSqGQl JxdNEcdnXHaIA== Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:45:04 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Anna-Maria Behnsen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] timers/migration: Rename childmask by parentmask to make naming more obvious Message-ID: References: <20240701-tmigr-fixes-v3-0-25cd5de318fb@linutronix.de> <20240701-tmigr-fixes-v3-6-25cd5de318fb@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240701-tmigr-fixes-v3-6-25cd5de318fb@linutronix.de> Le Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 12:18:42PM +0200, Anna-Maria Behnsen a écrit : > childmask in the group reflects the mask that is required to 'reference' > this group in the parent. When reading childmask, this might be confusing, > as this suggests, that this is the mask of the child of the group. OTOH ->parentmask could suggest this is the mask of the parent of the group. I'm not sure which one is better. ->childmask never sounded ambiguous to me so far. How about ->grpmask ? (deliberately stolen from RCU's node tree). Thanks.