Re: [PATCH v9 30/52] drm-dyndbg: adapt drm core to use dyndbg classmaps-v2

["Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 03:57:20PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> dyndbg's CLASSMAP-v1 api was broken; DECLARE_DYNDBG_CLASSMAP tried to
> do too much.  Its replaced by DRM_CLASSMAP_DEFINE, which creates &
> EXPORTs the classmap when CONFIG_DRM_USE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG=y, for direct
> reference by drivers.
> 
> The drivers still use DECLARE_DYNDBG_CLASSMAP for now, so they still
> redundantly re-declare the classmap, but we can convert the drivers
> later to DYNDBG_CLASSMAP_USE
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
>  include/drm/drm_print.h     |  8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
> index 699b7dbffd7b..4a5f2317229b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
> @@ -55,18 +55,19 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Enable debug output, where each bit enables a debug cat
>  #if !defined(CONFIG_DRM_USE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
>  module_param_named(debug, __drm_debug, ulong, 0600);
>  #else
> -/* classnames must match vals of enum drm_debug_category */
> -DECLARE_DYNDBG_CLASSMAP(drm_debug_classes, DD_CLASS_TYPE_DISJOINT_BITS, 0,
> -			"DRM_UT_CORE",
> -			"DRM_UT_DRIVER",
> -			"DRM_UT_KMS",
> -			"DRM_UT_PRIME",
> -			"DRM_UT_ATOMIC",
> -			"DRM_UT_VBL",
> -			"DRM_UT_STATE",
> -			"DRM_UT_LEASE",
> -			"DRM_UT_DP",
> -			"DRM_UT_DRMRES");
> +/* classnames must match value-symbols of enum drm_debug_category */
> +DRM_CLASSMAP_DEFINE(drm_debug_classes, DD_CLASS_TYPE_DISJOINT_BITS,
> +		    DRM_UT_CORE,
> +		    "DRM_UT_CORE",
> +		    "DRM_UT_DRIVER",
> +		    "DRM_UT_KMS",
> +		    "DRM_UT_PRIME",
> +		    "DRM_UT_ATOMIC",
> +		    "DRM_UT_VBL",
> +		    "DRM_UT_STATE",
> +		    "DRM_UT_LEASE",
> +		    "DRM_UT_DP",
> +		    "DRM_UT_DRMRES");

Looks like this stuff just ends up in an array, so presumably
it should be possible to use designated initializers to make this
less fragile?

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel