From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] rcu/nocb: Simplify (de-)offloading state machine
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:17:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoVBTCcbiTr0zWoF@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZoSLCHWKXAOvd5Zl@boqun-archlinux>
Le Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 04:19:36PM -0700, Boqun Feng a écrit :
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 03:45:52PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Now that the (de-)offloading process can only apply to offline CPUs,
> > there is no more concurrency between rcu_core and nocb kthreads. Also
> > the mutation now happens on empty queues.
> >
> > Therefore the state machine can be reduced to a single bit called
> > SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED. Simplify the transition as follows:
> >
> > * Upon offloading: queue the rdp to be added to the rcuog list and
> > wait for the rcuog kthread to set the SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED bit. Unpark
> > rcuo kthread.
> >
> > * Upon de-offloading: Park rcuo kthread. Queue the rdp to be removed
> > from the rcuog list and wait for the rcuog kthread to clear the
> > SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > ---
> [...]
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > index 24daf606de0c..72a2990d2087 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> [...]
> > @@ -1079,29 +1080,14 @@ static int rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > * but we stick to paranoia in this rare path.
> > */
> > rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
> > - rcu_segcblist_clear_flags(&rdp->cblist, SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_GP);
> > - rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
> > + rcu_segcblist_clear_flags(&rdp->cblist, SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->nocb_lock, flags);
> >
>
> Dropping rdp->nocb_lock unconditionally means we are the holder of it,
> right? If so, I think we better replace the above
> rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave() with raw_spin_lock_irqsave().
Good point, I'll do that.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-03 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-30 13:45 [PATCH 00/11] rcu/nocb: (De-)offloading on offline CPUs Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] rcu/nocb: Introduce RCU_NOCB_LOCKDEP_WARN() Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] rcu/nocb: Move nocb field at the end of state struct Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] rcu/nocb: Assert no callbacks while nocb kthread allocation fails Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] rcu/nocb: Introduce nocb mutex Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] rcu/nocb: (De-)offload callbacks on offline CPUs only Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from bypass Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 07/11] rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from rcu_core()'s QS reporting Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 08/11] rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from rcu_core Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 09/11] rcu/nocb: Remove SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 10/11] rcu/nocb: Remove SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_CB Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 11/11] rcu/nocb: Simplify (de-)offloading state machine Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-02 23:19 ` Boqun Feng
2024-07-03 12:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-07-03 22:56 ` [PATCH 11/11 v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-03 23:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-19 17:30 ` [PATCH 00/11] rcu/nocb: (De-)offloading on offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZoVBTCcbiTr0zWoF@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox