From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB7D1607A0; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720706719; cv=none; b=cDpe6vw/qcnavr9/3F+mticQdD4Ib4B49fZDRuh9YigCeZy6LgTLtQJA7OJm41WPbMdiyCn4A8+/cnr+LP4BUCVxc2iNN4JRpvPObgZ1UKwR2ldoZxk2XA1McKYRp/cgrmisW5svCxlw5lWWzaaZx66+/uRpBqR6J+/nVVfQfc8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720706719; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UYWdRu1rIaVIcVKllXBQPhDX2SQaDw4JQacRmQbuguY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GpiXyPzeGHlMG6QoGAMRlVzlmif0RCxcX6PNnULM2nnBTQYq7y35ngG7ILzxmeYfKt13vAs7ixBjF9ybvyjYbkagcZyV8QPAsn2dXb3pM9XbNsGypuF+Xi9HNzRa9lCAV5eABwcJHx57eYPzc33FJAgxXxjVbPYO2XC1tA86eYY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Y8IQucsp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Y8IQucsp" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 517EBC4AF0C; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:05:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720706718; bh=UYWdRu1rIaVIcVKllXBQPhDX2SQaDw4JQacRmQbuguY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y8IQucspU+bY04KNRG1/lreddTSKxG0ipYr3ZrhhmM0gQxQZjNngWKv6TO6+E9Lxk SrJjWm7AGp1oEYG0NZjUG4EpPdm/R1MRUrrCZFSBrVOkG4u2dwpU7imq1ip3z1IME+ jVIm0VCwjOkzDHkk6CppK85gM7KPJgYxpVVIclc0ttDGaw/BNGgLyqFD4S08/PnSHk vBnlLNlMhI3tj5Gw6F87jxUZWf0xO/KFeBdxGbhsFr6yZ0SnjK0+Mh36uG/YxT9HwJ 0vIFkCeUzyNA8YlPP8CbiUd4TDnozOyD7djLIAsQgU6R1xxcd9RscgHhEr5rLb5q1B JtGl2NRAdc+5Q== Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:05:17 -0400 From: Mike Snitzer To: Stephen Rothwell , Jens Axboe Cc: Mikulas Patocka , Alasdair G Kergon , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the device-mapper tree Message-ID: References: <20240711121729.0d71308e@canb.auug.org.au> <947e6d6b-f798-4f04-b6d7-d18ad550db66@kernel.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <947e6d6b-f798-4f04-b6d7-d18ad550db66@kernel.dk> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:16:20AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 7/10/24 8:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The following commit is also in the block tree as a different commit > > (but the same patch): > > > > e87621ac68fe ("dm: Refactor is_abnormal_io()") > > > > This is commit > > > > ae7e965b36e3 ("dm: Refactor is_abnormal_io()") > > > > in the block tree. Hi Stephen, I've fixed this. But FYI, you didn't send mail to Mikulas who was the committer in this instance. > Looks like the dm tree is re-applying patches yesterday rather > than pulling in the dependency? > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-6.11&id=e87621ac68fec9086d9f0af4fe96594dd8e07fbb > > why? Really good question. Mikulas has been handling DM for the 6.11 development cycle. But I've helped answer question and such along the way. We actually had a meeting on Tuesday to discuss outstanding patches (in patchwork) and specifically discussed this very patch. At the time I said I would get with you to make sure you were the one to pick up Damien's 5 patches (which included what is now commit e87621ac68fe in block). I specifically said that the entire series should go through block because even if DM picked up the one "dm: Refactor is_abnormal_io()" it'd cause problems because block would then depend on DM for a simple prep commit needed for later a patch in series. Anyway, I later saw you had already picked up Damien's series and had no need to reach out to you, I noted as much to a group chat at Red Hat (Mikulas included). So not really sure what happened. Sorry for the noise/trouble. Mike