From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1062D1AED46; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722429657; cv=none; b=safw0KcnOpXy6VJDs9Un0zjm7fEwby1FYhjET28Fcr0uTIu2eRK77UakT/vJMRqeY0jhXiriZedBVxC+iyb0esyDpvFAiWR3C8edSeEsx+opNRfAyiwNouAbU+aCIETzsH9DUqtIKlaUAgklpXaXIt00lHUGoKX5sw+Z/d8RaQ0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722429657; c=relaxed/simple; bh=duqqy9FL9G4nWKQpYv8ywzUJ0q6ntWy8Xd7uNyWtBd0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BU+pqy42CW9KtIUicjI3SwiN9MUPPngo0ZfcIlecWB5fLHT6SCZjM8reSLW+pGiCz61KyNMCw2lAOPUpQvFTBM/brj0ETgXFLqvbuA5COnaK1U3n3z4Hdew/ui/jLdsVVBHYb/BjrUBgavbwQf5cZ2W7MYL8x/JfRPQRelV1FmM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F841007; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 05:41:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D03D43F766; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 05:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:40:49 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Cristian Marussi Cc: Luke Parkin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] firmware: arm_scmi: Create debugfs files for counts Message-ID: References: <20240730093342.3558162-1-luke.parkin@arm.com> <20240730093342.3558162-5-luke.parkin@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 01:32:00PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 01:11:22PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:33:41AM +0100, Luke Parkin wrote: > > > Create debugfs files for the metrics in the debug_counters array > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Luke Parkin > > > --- > > > v3->v4 > > > Use new locations for debug array > > > Use counter instead of stats > > > v2->v3 > > > Add extra statistics also added in v3 > > > v1->v2 > > > Only create stats pointer if stats are enabled > > > Move stats debugfs creation into a seperate helper function > > > --- > > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > > > index 5acd3d324def..ec6434692d1a 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > > > @@ -2847,6 +2847,41 @@ static int scmi_device_request_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, > > > return NOTIFY_OK; > > > } > > > > > > +static void scmi_debugfs_counters_setup(struct scmi_debug_info *dbg, > > > + struct dentry *trans) > > > +{ > > > + struct dentry *counters; > > > + > > > + counters = debugfs_create_dir("counters", trans); > > > + > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("sent_ok", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[SENT_OK]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("sent_fail", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[SENT_FAIL]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("sent_fail_polling_unsupported", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[SENT_FAIL_POLLING_UNSUPPORTED]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("sent_fail_channel_not_found", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[SENT_FAIL_CHANNEL_NOT_FOUND]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("response_ok", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[RESPONSE_OK]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("notif_ok", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[NOTIF_OK]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("dlyd_resp_ok", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[DLYD_RESPONSE_OK]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("xfers_resp_timeout", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[XFERS_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("response_polled_ok", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[RESPONSE_POLLED_OK]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("err_msg_unexpected", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[ERR_MSG_UNEXPECTED]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("err_msg_invalid", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[ERR_MSG_INVALID]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("err_msg_nomem", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[ERR_MSG_NOMEM]); > > > + debugfs_create_atomic_t("err_protocol", 0400, counters, > > > + &dbg->counters[ERR_PROTOCOL]); > > > > Just curious and wonder if we can keep all these read-only and have another > > debugfs file which is write only to just reset the counters ? > > > > Cristian, > > > > Thoughts ? Or am I missing somthing ? > > Do you mean creating a bunch of additional reset_sent_ok > reset_ that are just WO and used to reset each single > counter ? No, not at all. Sorry if my response meant that. > (...I suppose because a global WO reset-all is already there...) > Indeed, I hadn't seen it carefully. Do we really need per counter reset ? For me one global reset all with all files read-only should suffice. Let me know if and why you think otherwise. -- Regards, Sudeep