From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Sachin P Bappalige <sachinpb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec/crash: no crash update when kexec in progress
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:43:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zqs8veRya7v/pXEt@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240731152738.194893-1-sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
On 07/31/24 at 08:57pm, Sourabh Jain wrote:
> The following errors are observed when kexec is done with SMT=off on
> powerpc.
>
> [ 358.458385] Removing IBM Power 842 compression device
> [ 374.795734] kexec_core: Starting new kernel
> [ 374.795748] kexec: Waking offline cpu 1.
> [ 374.875695] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> [ 374.935833] kexec: Waking offline cpu 2.
> [ 375.015664] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> snip..
> [ 375.515823] kexec: Waking offline cpu 6.
> [ 375.635667] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> [ 375.695836] kexec: Waking offline cpu 7.
>
> During kexec, the offline CPUs are brought online, which triggers the
Is this a generic action or specific on ppc about the offline CPUs being
brought line during kexec?
> crash hotplug handler `crash_handle_hotplug_event()` to update the kdump
> image. Given that the system is on the kexec path and the kexec lock is
> taken, the `crash_handle_hotplug_event()` function fails to take the
> same lock to update the kdump image, resulting in the above error
> messages.
>
> To fix this, let's return from `crash_handle_hotplug_event()` if kexec
> is in progress.
>
> The same applies to the `crash_check_hotplug_support()` function.
> Return 0 if kexec is in progress.
>
> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Reported-by: Sachin P Bappalige <sachinpb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/crash_core.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
> index 63cf89393c6e..d37a16d5c3a1 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> @@ -502,6 +502,9 @@ int crash_check_hotplug_support(void)
> {
> int rc = 0;
>
> + if (kexec_in_progress)
> + return 0;
> +
> crash_hotplug_lock();
> /* Obtain lock while reading crash information */
> if (!kexec_trylock()) {
> @@ -537,6 +540,9 @@ static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu,
> {
> struct kimage *image;
>
> + if (kexec_in_progress)
> + return;
> +
> crash_hotplug_lock();
> /* Obtain lock while changing crash information */
> if (!kexec_trylock()) {
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 15:27 [PATCH] kexec/crash: no crash update when kexec in progress Sourabh Jain
2024-08-01 2:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-08-01 6:51 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-19 4:15 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-19 6:15 ` Baoquan He
2024-08-20 6:40 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-30 11:17 ` Baoquan He
2024-09-04 9:25 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-09-05 3:23 ` Baoquan He
2024-09-05 8:37 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-09-08 10:30 ` Baoquan He
2024-09-09 5:05 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-09-09 5:23 ` Baoquan He
2024-09-09 5:31 ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-01 7:43 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-08-01 8:06 ` Sourabh Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zqs8veRya7v/pXEt@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=sachinpb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox