public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: void@manifault.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] sched_ext: Make task_can_run_on_remote_rq() use common task_allowed_on_cpu()
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 09:39:04 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZrJ72PZ2UTwubZRp@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240804024047.100355-7-tj@kernel.org>

task_can_run_on_remote_rq() is similar to is_cpu_allowed() but there are
subtle differences. It currently open codes all the tests. This is
cumbersome to understand and error-prone in case the intersecting tests need
to be updated.

Factor out the common part - testing whether the task is allowed on the CPU
at all regardless of the CPU state - into task_allowed_on_cpu() and make
both is_cpu_allowed() and SCX's task_can_run_on_remote_rq() use it. As the
code is now linked between the two and each contains only the extra tests
that differ between them, it's less error-prone when the conditions need to
be updated. Also, improve the comment to explain why they are different.

v2: Replace accidental "extern inline" with "static inline" (Peter).

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c  |    4 ++--
 kernel/sched/ext.c   |   21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/sched/sched.h |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2311,7 +2311,7 @@ static inline bool rq_has_pinned_tasks(s
 static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
 {
 	/* When not in the task's cpumask, no point in looking further. */
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+	if (!task_allowed_on_cpu(p, cpu))
 		return false;
 
 	/* migrate_disabled() must be allowed to finish. */
@@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct
 
 	/* Non kernel threads are not allowed during either online or offline. */
 	if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
-		return cpu_active(cpu) && task_cpu_possible(cpu, p);
+		return cpu_active(cpu);
 
 	/* KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU is always allowed. */
 	if (kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -2224,19 +2224,30 @@ static void consume_local_task(struct rq
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 /*
- * Similar to kernel/sched/core.c::is_cpu_allowed() but we're testing whether @p
- * can be pulled to @rq.
+ * Similar to kernel/sched/core.c::is_cpu_allowed(). However, there are two
+ * differences:
+ *
+ * - is_cpu_allowed() asks "Can this task run on this CPU?" while
+ *   task_can_run_on_remote_rq() asks "Can the BPF scheduler migrate the task to
+ *   this CPU?".
+ *
+ *   While migration is disabled, is_cpu_allowed() has to say "yes" as the task
+ *   must be allowed to finish on the CPU that it's currently on regardless of
+ *   the CPU state. However, task_can_run_on_remote_rq() must say "no" as the
+ *   BPF scheduler shouldn't attempt to migrate a task which has migration
+ *   disabled.
+ *
+ * - The BPF scheduler is bypassed while the rq is offline and we can always say
+ *   no to the BPF scheduler initiated migrations while offline.
  */
 static bool task_can_run_on_remote_rq(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
 {
 	int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
 
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+	if (!task_allowed_on_cpu(p, cpu))
 		return false;
 	if (unlikely(is_migration_disabled(p)))
 		return false;
-	if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && unlikely(!task_cpu_possible(cpu, p)))
-		return false;
 	if (!scx_rq_online(rq))
 		return false;
 	return true;
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2530,6 +2530,19 @@ extern void sched_balance_trigger(struct
 extern int __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *ctx);
 extern void set_cpus_allowed_common(struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *ctx);
 
+static inline bool task_allowed_on_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
+{
+	/* When not in the task's cpumask, no point in looking further. */
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+		return false;
+
+	/* Can @cpu run a user thread? */
+	if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && !task_cpu_possible(cpu, p))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static inline cpumask_t *alloc_user_cpus_ptr(int node)
 {
 	/*
@@ -2563,6 +2576,11 @@ extern int push_cpu_stop(void *arg);
 
 #else /* !CONFIG_SMP: */
 
+static inline bool task_allowed_on_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 static inline int __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p,
 					 struct affinity_context *ctx)
 {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-06 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-04  2:40 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Misc updates Tejun Heo
2024-08-04  2:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched_ext: Simplify scx_can_stop_tick() invocation in sched_can_stop_tick() Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 17:55   ` David Vernet
2024-08-04  2:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched_ext: Add scx_enabled() test to @start_class promotion in put_prev_task_balance() Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 17:57   ` David Vernet
2024-08-04  2:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched_ext: Use update_curr_common() in update_curr_scx() Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 18:23   ` David Vernet
2024-08-04  2:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched_ext: Simplify UP support by enabling sched_class->balance() in UP Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 19:49   ` David Vernet
2024-08-04  2:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched_ext: Improve comment on idle_sched_class exception in scx_task_iter_next_locked() Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 19:50   ` David Vernet
2024-08-04  2:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched_ext: Make task_can_run_on_remote_rq() use common task_allowed_on_cpu() Tejun Heo
2024-08-05 19:55   ` David Vernet
2024-08-06  8:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-06 17:04     ` Tejun Heo
2024-08-06 19:39   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-08-06  8:13 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.12] sched_ext: Misc updates Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-06 19:39 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZrJ72PZ2UTwubZRp@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox