From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Move data barrier to end of split walk
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:55:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZrUGpZVnUN1NaVga@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240808174243.2836363-1-coltonlewis@google.com>
Hi Colton,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 05:42:43PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
> This DSB guarantees page table updates have been made visible to the
> hardware table walker. Moving the DSB from stage2_split_walker() to
> after the walk is finished in kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() results in a
> roughly 70% reduction in Clear Dirty Log Time in
> dirty_log_perf_test (modified to use eager page splitting) when using
> huge pages. This gain holds steady through a range of vcpus
> used (tested 1-64) and memory used (tested 1-64GB).
Would you have time to put together a patch for the dirty_log_perf_test
changes you've made? This would be quite valuable for testing future
improvements to eager page splitting.
> This is safe to do because nothing else is using the page tables while
> they are still being mapped and this is how other page table walkers
> already function. None of them have a data barrier in the walker
> itself because relative ordering of table PTEs to table contents comes
> from the release semantics of stage2_make_pte().
>
> Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
The diff itself looks good to me, so:
Acked-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
--
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-08 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-08 17:42 [PATCH v2] KVM: arm64: Move data barrier to end of split walk Colton Lewis
2024-08-08 17:55 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-08-08 19:58 ` Colton Lewis
2024-08-22 14:25 ` (subset) " Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZrUGpZVnUN1NaVga@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox