public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Petr Tesarik <petr@tesarici.cz>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Document/kexec: Generalize crash hotplug description
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:04:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zrrpcn7cnCigNfWd@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812041651.703156-1-sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>

On 08/12/24 at 09:46am, Sourabh Jain wrote:
......
> ---
> 
> Changelog:
> 
> Since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240805050829.297171-1-sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com/
>   - Update crash_hotplug sysfs document as suggested by Petr T
>   - Update an error message in crash_handle_hotplug_event and
>     crash_check_hotplug_support function.
> 
> ---
......
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
> index 63cf89393c6e..c1048893f4b6 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ int crash_check_hotplug_support(void)
>  	crash_hotplug_lock();
>  	/* Obtain lock while reading crash information */
>  	if (!kexec_trylock()) {
> -		pr_info("kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate\n");
> +		pr_info("kexec_trylock() failed, kdump image may be inaccurate\n");

Wondering why this need be updated.

>  		crash_hotplug_unlock();
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> @@ -520,18 +520,25 @@ int crash_check_hotplug_support(void)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * To accurately reflect hot un/plug changes of cpu and memory resources
> - * (including onling and offlining of those resources), the elfcorehdr
> - * (which is passed to the crash kernel via the elfcorehdr= parameter)
> - * must be updated with the new list of CPUs and memories.
> + * To accurately reflect hot un/plug changes of CPU and Memory resources
> + * (including onling and offlining of those resources), the relevant
> + * kexec segments must be updated with latest CPU and Memory resources.
>   *
> - * In order to make changes to elfcorehdr, two conditions are needed:
> - * First, the segment containing the elfcorehdr must be large enough
> - * to permit a growing number of resources; the elfcorehdr memory size
> - * is based on NR_CPUS_DEFAULT and CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES.
> - * Second, purgatory must explicitly exclude the elfcorehdr from the
> - * list of segments it checks (since the elfcorehdr changes and thus
> - * would require an update to purgatory itself to update the digest).
> + * Architectures must ensure two things for all segments that need
> + * updating during hotplug events:
> + *
> + * 1. Segments must be large enough to accommodate a growing number of
> + *    resources.
> + * 2. Exclude the segments from SHA verification.
> + *
> + * For example, on most architectures, the elfcorehdr (which is passed
> + * to the crash kernel via the elfcorehdr= parameter) must include the
> + * new list of CPUs and memory. To make changes to the elfcorehdr, it
> + * should be large enough to permit a growing number of CPU and Memory
> + * resources. One can estimate the elfcorehdr memory size based on
> + * NR_CPUS_DEFAULT and CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES. The elfcorehdr is
> + * excluded from SHA verification by default if the architecture
> + * supports crash hotplug.
>   */
>  static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu, void *arg)
>  {
> @@ -540,7 +547,7 @@ static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu,
>  	crash_hotplug_lock();
>  	/* Obtain lock while changing crash information */
>  	if (!kexec_trylock()) {
> -		pr_info("kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate\n");
> +		pr_info("kexec_trylock() failed, kdump image may be inaccurate\n");
>  		crash_hotplug_unlock();
>  		return;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-13  5:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-12  4:16 [PATCH v2] Document/kexec: Generalize crash hotplug description Sourabh Jain
2024-08-12  5:41 ` Petr Tesarik
2024-08-12  5:45   ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-13  5:04 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-08-13  5:28   ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-13  9:17     ` Baoquan He
2024-08-13  9:25       ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-19  4:11       ` Sourabh Jain
2024-08-19  9:36 ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zrrpcn7cnCigNfWd@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=petr@tesarici.cz \
    --cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox