From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3F0E19D8AC; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 18:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723573758; cv=none; b=C74oENQGUbjRXnnWOk+ZhSBW7wWmvMyAYSjxNs53zzgLSkKgVSWJjbgEBUJ/StYnSwkrnU2ssP9FKoJDAA5SUedGpXNtoL1p/EFNC9Y5FFo3G2AUZnj4u7eNTjLU93a9yrBWc4Uu/qtqm1KEuAZtEmoTgeV+mekwHx2oKZPnzrU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723573758; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7auds1cADml3EgTlOMSvp2UKdkYARksA969CZ+JXqW4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=osFSvy6bj4ArYUWPw/s7O1QEeBwGBOH/5AtHa2BQgoSRt8jBT/xduGF/Ov6tJUyKBDftuRev9S/aVNb6fzFGVwoPCjRaAjNgzA5vnMoYmgwFavznltONzyOpPy8iH8I+DWezx8fmEIVF7/dZEEmz9XdRWRck8Iz0NkW2OiQ3ht0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=aTSi6luC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="aTSi6luC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1723573757; x=1755109757; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=7auds1cADml3EgTlOMSvp2UKdkYARksA969CZ+JXqW4=; b=aTSi6luC04c/DHiu2wSzg1Ob9UNz+0XTfq4335tL5sOJRe3FG6zcW4Yq d9N/MRk9Ho4ltDJqau/OQoD2Hv603Bz3ImG8xvZjtt8q3FfO2OpLokSEI b+tGhDtCBq26t5ivnjrx1pRkcCOOvzkkoUKxgWdBobpT//bbMJJKyuonl ksQEFAuNMz9g6MXE0QWtso6VMLPw+zxqMTOa1kFUgLJJDgO9Xhn5pgT5C Hv8rVi4bBZEwRhkuVYo9bTB2b6vImoDfpG/jScO8w7SmhE0woOCIChHBV pu7GCyTTTjBwkDNge6Zcm/Ax1tH2yVDteWgErxQpHXJ+rh4jfm8uOCr/S g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iqQsqVMiStm0g6QE/Ab8PQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yKV4MckjQra3BgKqWHnjRQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11163"; a="25549194" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,286,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="25549194" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Aug 2024 11:29:16 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: jeudTc1KTxyWleXHm4L0aQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: pF8W2tlCQdKJCrZgl0Xp1A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,286,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="63601984" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Aug 2024 11:29:15 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sdwGd-0000000EwRM-3xGd; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 21:29:11 +0300 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 21:29:11 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mark Brown , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: ppc4xx: Avoid returning 0 when failed to parse and map IRQ Message-ID: References: <20240813160220.2357338-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240813160220.2357338-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:02:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > 0 is incorrect error code when failed to parse and map IRQ. > Replace OF specific old API for IRQ retrieval with a generic > one to fix this issue. Scratch it, it has the same issue and it seems it predates the mentioned patch as we need to return a real error code. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko