Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: k3-r5: Delay notification of wakeup event

[Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>]

On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 11:31:32AM +0530, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
> From: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
> 
> Few times, core1 was scheduled to boot first before core0, which leads
> to error:
> 
> 'k3_r5_rproc_start: can not start core 1 before core 0'.
> 
> This was happening due to some scheduling between prepare and start
> callback. The probe function waits for event, which is getting
> triggered by prepare callback. To avoid above condition move event
> trigger to start instead of prepare callback.

I can see the race condition.

> 
> Fixes: 61f6f68447ab ("remoteproc: k3-r5: Wait for core0 power-up before powering up core1")
> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
> [ Applied wakeup event trigger only for Split-Mode booted rprocs ]
> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> index 39a47540c590..f1710a61247f 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -464,8 +464,6 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
>  			ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> -	core->released_from_reset = true;
> -	wake_up_interruptible(&cluster->core_transition);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Newer IP revisions like on J7200 SoCs support h/w auto-initialization
> @@ -587,6 +585,9 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		ret = k3_r5_core_run(core);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto put_mbox;
> +
> +		core->released_from_reset = true;
> +		wake_up_interruptible(&cluster->core_transition);

This patch doesn't apply due to recent changes made to the k3-r5 driver.  Please
rebase and resubmit.

Thanks,
Mathieu

>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>