public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] cpumask: Implement cpumask_{first,next}_{not,}andnot
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 12:24:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsOcC_6S3_GviaIJ@yury-ThinkPad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240819142406.339084-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 04:24:03PM +0200, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Allow finding the first or next bit within two input cpumasks which is
> either:

"first or next CPU..." here.
 
> - both zero and zero,
> - respectively one and zero.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpumask.h | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index 23686bed441d..57b7d99d6da1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -204,6 +204,32 @@ unsigned int cpumask_first_and_and(const struct cpumask *srcp1,
>  				      cpumask_bits(srcp3), small_cpumask_bits);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * cpumask_first_andnot - return the first cpu from *srcp1 & ~*srcp2
> + * @src1p: the first input
> + * @src2p: the second input
> + *
> + * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus match in both.
> + */
> +static inline
> +unsigned int cpumask_first_andnot(const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2)

Please use __always_inline to enforce a compile-time optimizations.
Check for this series:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240719005127.2449328-4-briannorris@chromium.org/T/

It's already in -next.

Thanks,
Yury

> +{
> +	return find_first_andnot_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp1), cpumask_bits(srcp2), nr_cpumask_bits);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cpumask_first_notandnot - return the first cpu from ~*srcp1 & ~*srcp2
> + * @src1p: the first input
> + * @src2p: the second input
> + *
> + * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus match in both.
> + */
> +static inline
> +unsigned int cpumask_first_notandnot(const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2)
> +{
> +	return find_first_notandnot_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp1), cpumask_bits(srcp2), nr_cpumask_bits);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * cpumask_last - get the last CPU in a cpumask
>   * @srcp:	- the cpumask pointer
> @@ -246,6 +272,40 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
>  	return find_next_zero_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp), small_cpumask_bits, n+1);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * cpumask_next_andnot - return the next cpu from *srcp1 & ~*srcp2
> + * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (ie. return will be > @n)
> + * @src1p: the first input
> + * @src2p: the second input
> + *
> + * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus match in both.
> + */
> +static inline
> +unsigned int cpumask_next_andnot(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2)
> +{
> +	/* -1 is a legal arg here. */
> +	if (n != -1)
> +		cpumask_check(n);
> +	return find_next_andnot_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp1), cpumask_bits(srcp2), nr_cpumask_bits, n+1);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cpumask_next_notandnot - return the next cpu from ~*srcp1 & ~*srcp2
> + * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (ie. return will be > @n)
> + * @src1p: the first input
> + * @src2p: the second input
> + *
> + * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus match in both.
> + */
> +static inline
> +unsigned int cpumask_next_notandnot(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2)
> +{
> +	/* -1 is a legal arg here. */
> +	if (n != -1)
> +		cpumask_check(n);
> +	return find_next_notandnot_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp1), cpumask_bits(srcp2), nr_cpumask_bits, n+1);
> +}
> +
>  #if NR_CPUS == 1
>  /* Uniprocessor: there is only one valid CPU */
>  static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
> -- 
> 2.39.2

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-19 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-19 14:24 [RFC PATCH 0/5] sched: NUMA-aware concurrency IDs Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-19 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] lib: Implement find_{first,next,nth}_notandnot_bit, find_first_andnot_bit Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-19 19:19   ` Yury Norov
2024-08-20 17:19     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-20 20:45       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-20 21:15         ` Yury Norov
2024-08-19 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] cpumask: Implement cpumask_{first,next}_{not,}andnot Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-19 19:24   ` Yury Norov [this message]
2024-08-20 17:28     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-19 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] sched: NUMA-aware per-memory-map concurrency IDs Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-19 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] selftests/rseq: x86: Implement rseq_load_u32_u32 Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-19 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] selftests/rseq: Implement NUMA node id vs mm_cid invariant test Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-22  2:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] sched: NUMA-aware concurrency IDs Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZsOcC_6S3_GviaIJ@yury-ThinkPad \
    --to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox