public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
	David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: A set of fixes
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 09:43:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsgMXv3sQgcw3aNl@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e53159a9-3451-4255-8fa0-bb9aeee09fce@amd.com>

Hello Mario,


On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:41:30PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 8/13/2024 04:51, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> > Hello Rafael, Viresh,
> > 
> > This series contains three fixes for the amd-pstate driver for 6.11.
> > Could you please include it in your tree?
> > 
> > These patches are based on linux-pm/master with the top commit
> > 7c626ce4bae1 ("Linux 6.11-rc3").
> > 
> > There are three patches,
> > 
> > 1. To fix an uninitialized variable in amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update()
> >     from Dan Carpenter:
> >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7ff53543-6c04-48a0-8d99-7dc010b93b3a@stanley.mountain/
> > 
> > 2. Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of
> >     topology_logical_die_id() definition of the later function has
> >     changed on some AMD processors since the inclusion of the CPUID
> >     0x80000026 parser:
> >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240801124509.3650-1-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com/
> > 
> > 3. Remove a warning for the absence fo X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and
> >     Zen2 since they don't have the feature defined. This fixes the
> >     regression reported by David Wang:
> >     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240730140111.4491-1-00107082@163.com/

> > 
> > Thanks and Regards
> > gautham.
> > 
> > Dan Carpenter (1):
> >    cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix uninitialized variable in
> >      amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update()
> > 
> > Gautham R. Shenoy (2):
> >    cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of
> >      logical_die_id()
> >    cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove warning for X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and
> >      Zen2
> > 
> >   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 10 ++++------
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> Thanks for handling these.  I'm back now, I'm digging through my inbox.
> Assuming Rafael didn't already pull these I'll batch these into my
> amd-pstate branch for the robots to bang on and then send a PR after I go
> through everything else that happened.

Thank you Mario. I will be sending an updated version to Patch 3
"Remove warning for X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and Zen2" to incorporate
feedback from Xiaojian.

Please merge the Patches 1 and 2 from this series.

--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-23  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-13  9:51 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: A set of fixes Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-08-13  9:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix uninitialized variable in amd_pstate_cpu_boost_update() Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-08-13  9:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Use topology_logical_package_id() instead of logical_die_id() Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-08-13  9:54   ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Remove warning for X86_FEATURE_CPPC on Zen1 and Zen2 Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-08-14  9:29     ` Xiaojian Du
2024-08-21  5:41       ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: A set of fixes Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23  4:13   ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
2024-08-23 15:42     ` Mario Limonciello

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZsgMXv3sQgcw3aNl@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com \
    --to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=00107082@163.com \
    --cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox