From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1152190661 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724929598; cv=none; b=KHvk3AaDi0PwgbY1/9JcHHhDn+tkdo/8ICOY70XcxspW8U4VnExnggvaMaZ5JBwOB5WnPCDzZlJc32JY6aRqcu+gWyiSxR3pl6uKBcNW5G6RerkXxvNgCroppb0wDjC0nHi74q7U9Oke6LZUwKyJcPliL71kqRott+WqlCogdUc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724929598; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uRpFzjlZ7Ai/nO4F2kVPVYXtCZasLM6bdoo5lTOaLEg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EM7E7oObNS0AzEKJWxTcyzO+NjzVMPnK7heUtj3UAqx5h3dkO63/9fSraXy/E6ELBVRnLkWQQvrvdHlK+WoU+5ocL+7BMwuYksWRtQaz9XRwAdflUZaTU0dhM2X+2i3n0oCGYR7rQ/z0L6f5G74n+8sYy6QgrVDywEsFd1loKnk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Dy4cP0CF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Dy4cP0CF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1724929598; x=1756465598; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=uRpFzjlZ7Ai/nO4F2kVPVYXtCZasLM6bdoo5lTOaLEg=; b=Dy4cP0CF+ba01FnGOllsowOMk+6y/7sPPchshfcbWtkxYy799wC4qWZF AkxJ7R35va+vvwoxauR3LcjbCYBJ2ra0ufdjSilAIykfeicbnf62EKqT7 D9Su0+yoF8VGAzwvJr9EFkWeMUM5oop8neSA+TMBn1X41q6dlep2rC3n5 abhP9LC7uxZfMYGUwUba670Rr2rzhoOlKHM7ZewNpQ7OGWdLiKhJ6W8UP 5kKWfe6lr2gbWz0kno7DGU1xIocZlTTtVWLDH+K5Ue+klXtBASoXiZPms v1TkfpV9960Kb3d24HWSlm0Oc3NzBiD1i96ozxkvBegA7TxJEflUFlV0x Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: O13cDeoBTXuN6q72IbI35Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bKRrwZFgQXGkc80xXkiqMw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11178"; a="34170438" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,185,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="34170438" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2024 04:06:37 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: g8c8LC+rQquyXsOH+xikeQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ioR/cnlZTrWunCXIi85ahg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,185,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="94278260" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2024 04:06:36 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sjcz2-00000002yM2-33B3; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:06:32 +0300 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:06:32 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Cc: Lee Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: intel-lpss: New LPSS PCI IDs Message-ID: References: <20240829095719.1557-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240829095719.1557-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 12:57:17PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > Hi, > > Here are a few LPSS PCI IDs for new platforms. The Arrow Lake-H one was > sent already in the previous cycle but it might have fallen through the > crack so resending it here. I believe that the choices for SPI and I2C (i.e. SSP types and I2C functional clock rates) were carefully chosen in accordance with the specifications. With this in mind, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko