public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] android: binder: modify incorrect comments
@ 2024-08-30  7:37 bajing
  2024-08-31 14:16 ` Carlos Llamas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: bajing @ 2024-08-30  7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh
  Cc: arve, tkjos, maco, joel, brauner, cmllamas, surenb, linux-kernel,
	bajing

The comment for binder_proc_unlock was incorrect, so it should be modified.

Signed-off-by: bajing <bajing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
 drivers/android/binder.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
index fc55b5d0e4f3..578861d57045 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ _binder_proc_lock(struct binder_proc *proc, int line)
 }
 
 /**
- * binder_proc_unlock() - Release spinlock for given binder_proc
+ * binder_proc_unlock() - Release outer lock for given binder_proc
  * @proc:                struct binder_proc to acquire
  *
  * Release lock acquired via binder_proc_lock()
-- 
2.33.0




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] android: binder: modify incorrect comments
  2024-08-30  7:37 [PATCH] android: binder: modify incorrect comments bajing
@ 2024-08-31 14:16 ` Carlos Llamas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Llamas @ 2024-08-31 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bajing; +Cc: gregkh, arve, tkjos, maco, joel, brauner, surenb, linux-kernel

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 03:37:43PM +0800, bajing wrote:
> The comment for binder_proc_unlock was incorrect, so it should be modified.

Can you specify why the comment is incorrect?

> 
> Signed-off-by: bajing <bajing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
>  drivers/android/binder.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
> index fc55b5d0e4f3..578861d57045 100644
> --- a/drivers/android/binder.c
> +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ _binder_proc_lock(struct binder_proc *proc, int line)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * binder_proc_unlock() - Release spinlock for given binder_proc
> + * binder_proc_unlock() - Release outer lock for given binder_proc
>   * @proc:                struct binder_proc to acquire
>   *
>   * Release lock acquired via binder_proc_lock()
> -- 
> 2.33.0
> 

I'm ok with your change. It is specific about which spinlock it releases
(even though this is obvious from the code). It also pairs better with
the acquire comment block in binder_proc_lock().

However, you need to modify your commit message as the current comment
is technically _not_ incorrect. Can you please send a v2?

Thanks,
--
Carlos Llamas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-31 14:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-30  7:37 [PATCH] android: binder: modify incorrect comments bajing
2024-08-31 14:16 ` Carlos Llamas

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox