From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E168F19E964; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 12:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725279518; cv=none; b=q2PZjdcXzPTqWieVeYVn/9gFR3YnoXn0YEdfzIh18AG4/7/tR03Q4lXWRmIuQhjmQ4S9GWvG8/vXWqv5hRh9xzxx6jNgO1CDZRvCEDMXJK9uDGz6WDvhtHsEfCNB8U8Iyjt1vfojeymYLjx5807V3GMuFx/ePbLDWqEnCnUyUzk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725279518; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fxVY6dBiWuDLEpVY3cC9s81DNtS4B2Lptr5+oMNkXkc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HLJC6elmcjdIc9UwgrMBOovUlMephbHAYVsX5mEulwN3v6cxfVSnMiu0LoXm+iNjiw+acZTXur8oYm36B0YNaloicyp6/OZWBlYTVXi/n+SBHXifMEcQOnR0jkF4L0uN5TdkIkktTmTUVMpwQP+lQtbGmOek0g36V8qfNDowN7c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6pM/DsbTQ06uMYPqOuDM2A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NYjkNNRQTICfHwEv5+wJwQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11182"; a="23732816" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,195,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="23732816" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2024 05:18:36 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OPLZp/o0Rpitp0EQM4MhlA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: th07cN+aTTmfY/16FslFrg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,195,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="65094483" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2024 05:18:34 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sl60u-00000004M6B-1Oia; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 15:18:32 +0300 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:18:32 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: pch: kerneldoc fixes for excess members Message-ID: References: <20240902121258.64094-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <413bfe77-5942-428e-a0ad-43d9e8605270@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <413bfe77-5942-428e-a0ad-43d9e8605270@linaro.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 02:13:56PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 02/09/2024 14:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Drop kerneldoc description of 'lock' to fix W=1 warning: > > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c:101: warning: Excess struct member 'lock' description in 'pch_gpio' ... > Eh, crap, forgot tag which now applies completely: > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Yep, thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko