From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@intel.com>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-direct: fix the page free when it is not addressable
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 16:00:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZtbCLmsIF3On+aEv@chenyu5-mobl2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240903073521.GA2269@lst.de>
Hi Christoph,
On 2024-09-03 at 09:35:21 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 07:01:19PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > When the CMA allocation succeeds but isn't addressable, its
> > buffer has already been released and the page is set to NULL.
> > So later when the normal page allocation succeeds but isn't
> > addressable, __free_pages() should be used to free that normal
> > page rather than freeing continuous page(CMA).
>
> So the patch is obviously correct and probably useful, but I don't think
> the existing code is buggy.
>
> dma_free_contiguous calls into cma_release, which uses cma_pages_valid to
> check if the page belongs to the CMA pool and retuns early if not,
> letting dma_free_contiguous fall back to __free_pages eventually.
>
> What am I missing here?
>
Thanks for taking a look. Your are right, the pfn will be checked in
cma_pages_valid() to see it is within the CMA range, if not, it prints
some messages and return false, finally falls into __free_pages(). From
the functional point of view, there is no bug. From the efficiency point
of view(extra checks/printed message), and from the code readability to
avoid confusing, maybe we can refine it?
thanks,
Chenyu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-03 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-31 11:01 [PATCH] dma-direct: fix the page free when it is not addressable Chen Yu
2024-09-03 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-03 8:00 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2024-09-03 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZtbCLmsIF3On+aEv@chenyu5-mobl2 \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox