From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41AA218DF78; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 18:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725386971; cv=none; b=AXwTirv+qDHpRQ7TCLP4PI9xuT8bS9LY63pqcqJ44/+0l9QEF4IOqyzq0uXJ2+PgwZyybPrbReWZgKwm3gfI67+Pmt/Y8KUnAgfm27naRxJI/FqiAhCGROLwLzBhBfUqYZdDXBj2+4ky9mLnnuWSLW5ofCNG80ssVLmUnRq67P8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725386971; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1/wa6dmOiQR2kuGnKHwGR3pQ3U7BTwDOhzLIzse3DPM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=up8z06GR+Xc+FmssusoCCFx4zl6D1mpwlgs8LhOGJeSgXLbpwd9gXoJiBCTCGf3ZnK2eUU3YmRPPdZ+jVZAZjjaEf/oLNVyWRQ5Gev7tH2HqKMvmYKsG8ZEo3xx+G1qSiJf9hgDDNdpdtuhohQRMmlV9hwWGp+I8+zTvMtv1/kU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lMnnm3Zl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lMnnm3Zl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1725386971; x=1756922971; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1/wa6dmOiQR2kuGnKHwGR3pQ3U7BTwDOhzLIzse3DPM=; b=lMnnm3Zlby4poQJjI8GceK9wFUi218pIJxHDi7ihmZtguqs0KhxPxcPi Vxmi+pYKx0d28DjbMyd7+9ev0rEbK9qCNPlsIVOKgGlyU4naTYG9371FH LPCrHV5/UX60SZJ/W9jJa8d93vK2WXyVFUHFdvWGsFrIeXb7SuHikX4v3 zboupbLYYs5NoEA4nMxIhcF62v8CHoDKjtlkAlZLpslXyws5vlby5pVmm n58KGeJZQhRYJ/cdEpAJdZ7OdEcEvOpsaIQCz0G/fiKtBtcvpamdF2+ZQ QhxV3nd7ZT4OGqaWwpsoUDgZxyUZrTuzuM+dXACvl86GhQqIqWoE+vvGT g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 4ACzHa1eQe6c6yVhzHFFWA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7ZOHaDWwSRWhLiKhjwx4TA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11184"; a="23571444" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,199,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="23571444" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2024 11:09:30 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: z7Nx9V2KTfeoEKSgqH5d2g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: jlzMR6hsSoCPu7drFJwQRw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,199,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="69616555" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2024 11:09:27 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1slXy0-00000004ngi-2Pk5; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 21:09:24 +0300 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 21:09:24 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Jonathan Cameron , Srinivas Pandruvada , Basavaraj Natikar , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jiri Kosina , Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Lorenzo Bianconi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Use aligned data type for timestamp Message-ID: References: <20240903180218.3640501-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240903180218.3640501-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240903180218.3640501-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 08:59:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Use __aligned_s64 for the timestamp field. Oh, heck. I forgot to change the commit message... ... > - /* Ensure natural alignment of buffer elements */ ...and for some reason this haven't been updated to be not removed. I have updated locally, but will wait for other comments, maybe it's the only problem and Jonathan can fix whilst applying. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko