From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/12] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 16:47:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zthk25W0zXcHWRdt@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240904090016.2841572-9-wenst@chromium.org>
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:00:10PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Some devices are designed and manufactured with some components having
> multiple drop-in replacement options. These components are often
> connected to the mainboard via ribbon cables, having the same signals
> and pin assignments across all options. These may include the display
> panel and touchscreen on laptops and tablets, and the trackpad on
> laptops. Sometimes which component option is used in a particular device
> can be detected by some firmware provided identifier, other times that
> information is not available, and the kernel has to try to probe each
> device.
>
> This change attempts to make the "probe each device" case cleaner. The
> current approach is to have all options added and enabled in the device
> tree. The kernel would then bind each device and run each driver's probe
> function. This works, but has been broken before due to the introduction
> of asynchronous probing, causing multiple instances requesting "shared"
> resources, such as pinmuxes, GPIO pins, interrupt lines, at the same
> time, with only one instance succeeding. Work arounds for these include
> moving the pinmux to the parent I2C controller, using GPIO hogs or
> pinmux settings to keep the GPIO pins in some fixed configuration, and
> requesting the interrupt line very late. Such configurations can be seen
> on the MT8183 Krane Chromebook tablets, and the Qualcomm sc8280xp-based
> Lenovo Thinkpad 13S.
>
> Instead of this delicate dance between drivers and device tree quirks,
> this change introduces a simple I2C component probe. function For a
> given class of devices on the same I2C bus, it will go through all of
> them, doing a simple I2C read transfer and see which one of them responds.
> It will then enable the device that responds.
>
> This requires some minor modifications in the existing device tree. The
> status for all the device nodes for the component options must be set
> to "failed-needs-probe". This makes it clear that some mechanism is
> needed to enable one of them, and also prevents the prober and device
> drivers running at the same time.
...
> +int i2c_of_probe_component(struct device *dev, const char *type)
> +{
> + struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> + int ret;
> +
> + struct device_node *i2c_node __free(device_node) = i2c_of_probe_get_i2c_node(dev, type);
> + if (IS_ERR(i2c_node))
> + return PTR_ERR(i2c_node);
> + for_each_child_of_node_scoped(i2c_node, node) {
Hmm, but can it be for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix_scoped() now?
> + if (!of_node_name_prefix(node, type))
> + continue;
> + if (!of_device_is_available(node))
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Device tree has component already enabled. Either the
> + * device tree isn't supported or we already probed once.
> + */
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + i2c = of_get_i2c_adapter_by_node(i2c_node);
> + if (!i2c)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "Couldn't get I2C adapter\n");
> +
> + ret = 0;
> + for_each_child_of_node_scoped(i2c_node, node) {
Ditto.
> + union i2c_smbus_data data;
> + u32 addr;
> +
> + if (!of_node_name_prefix(node, type))
> + continue;
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &addr))
> + continue;
> + if (i2c_smbus_xfer(i2c, addr, 0, I2C_SMBUS_READ, 0, I2C_SMBUS_BYTE, &data) < 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Found a device that is responding */
> + ret = i2c_of_probe_enable_node(dev, node);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + i2c_put_adapter(i2c);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
...
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_of_probe_component);
Wonder if we may already use namespaced export from day 1.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-04 9:00 [PATCH v6 00/12] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] of: dynamic: Add of_changeset_update_prop_string Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix_scoped() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 13:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-04 13:43 ` Rob Herring
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] regulator: Move OF-specific regulator lookup code to of_regulator.c Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 13:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-04 13:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-05 8:11 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-05 8:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] regulator: Split up _regulator_get() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] regulator: Do pure DT regulator lookup in of_regulator_bulk_get_all() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 13:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-09 2:39 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] gpiolib: Add gpio_get_property_name_length() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 13:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-09 2:45 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11 7:37 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11 14:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] i2c: core: Remove extra space in Makefile Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 13:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 13:47 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-09-09 3:02 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 15:37 ` Rob Herring
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] i2c: of-prober: Add regulator support Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 13:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-04 22:57 ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-05 15:10 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-05 18:14 ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-05 18:42 ` Mark Brown
2024-09-05 19:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-06 3:45 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11 0:30 ` Doug Anderson
2024-09-11 6:12 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-11 14:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-11 14:49 ` Mark Brown
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] i2c: of-prober: Add GPIO support Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 14:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] platform/chrome: Introduce device tree hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 10:08 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2024-09-05 3:52 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-05 4:34 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2024-09-04 9:00 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Mark touchscreens and trackpads as fail Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-04 17:19 ` (subset) [PATCH v6 00/12] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Mark Brown
2024-09-07 16:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-09-09 3:24 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zthk25W0zXcHWRdt@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox