From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
cristian.marussi@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, johan@kernel.org,
konradybcio@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Skip adding bad duplicates
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 17:20:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZtiI0u0nAUbWEAAR@pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZtiG7YLcnOR9IIuE@bogus>
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:12:29PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:43:24AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > Ensure that the bad duplicates reported by the platform firmware doesn't
> > get added to the opp-tables.
> >
>
> I am really interested to know if the platform firmware is presenting
> duplicates intentionally for some unknown reasons and we are just speculating
> it to be broken firmware or is it really broken firmware.
>
> For me, it is very hard to digest something like OPP tables which is there
> for a very long time now is not very well understood by firmware authors.
> How many duplicates are we seeing on this platform really ? If it is
> just one I can understand. More than one is hard to miss from the OPP
> tables in the firmware.
>
> While I am not opposing to make the driver handle these duplicates,
> I am just worried if they are put there intentionally for reasons we
> don't understand yet or not published.
>
The number of duplicates reported in logs makes me suspect the same...seems
like intentional/by_design .... but at first I stick to the general issue
of handling bad fw replies and how to survive kernel side at first...but I
indeed share your same concerns...
Thanks,
Cristian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-04 3:13 [PATCH V2 0/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Misc Fixes Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 3:13 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Ensure that the message-id supports fastchannel Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 7:00 ` Johan Hovold
2024-09-04 11:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-04 12:38 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-09-04 14:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-05 12:54 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-10-07 6:46 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 3:13 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Skip adding bad duplicates Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 7:09 ` Johan Hovold
2024-09-04 8:05 ` Johan Hovold
2024-09-04 13:56 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-04 14:00 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-04 15:21 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-04 15:30 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-04 15:46 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-05 12:43 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-10-07 7:00 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-10-09 14:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-04 16:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-09-04 16:20 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2024-10-07 6:51 ` Sibi Sankar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZtiI0u0nAUbWEAAR@pluto \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox