From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F5519B3FF; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 12:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725540998; cv=none; b=K+Yl25eHHd6WPoYz7oGpB2hPlmmXkZhvYLxJry9ijPBXVAeGWI9/QmDo5BiHnPj5PMGYTKCg7R1jpDkkqwS41tx9PUabpnkG1dkBOZ9dA+RUM/RQgzO1KsASiiqV3FPh9167YdusS2OyLkDv5K0lxlHmCFogYI8/uL24VmNyWr4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725540998; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xYIh/bt8ATiDqQSVPUkjd8FviXEE9vSnRc0D+1k9vd4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LO7LYC0wBp9RRjgfr5Pup0itrrbgX/zJDPmyCvmivH6jumv0gKL7M3Sry3HnjLfb3P8DVnOhgJRX6rX3VhKci2lNQpWqSydED6QNDRRQdwQCB0oFjQ4EYkm1T1spqcgi6e5ccMOzwosG9Hr7/j4FCveqNZkke5RRP/a43e0qzd8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ZJTtVrsj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ZJTtVrsj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1725540997; x=1757076997; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=xYIh/bt8ATiDqQSVPUkjd8FviXEE9vSnRc0D+1k9vd4=; b=ZJTtVrsjzsRUmv7N86h5YUpFDSI/G8h0Hcf6F906YBkpKDmypJ3Eorun 3twViT2Tw+uXBgUhh7zvAl4Q9VHdwc31aKdVHLUYqS86hkp8uCZnhkydy xeY+w1PqcZUSMq6F7iUKAzXe6rbZoW4CwUFJF03y2BGS9UEJAvuGDCiKK q3Ttga8RhP26Cav3xlVnt5SRpVIH8FgyHTOfQQKSdP44sJbiL6MlNyiIR kkHthlSm6I304Odo4E0mHJ9QNfWGbOh+VFDJNC1nIpXCmL9+ptsQCm697 SPEx/ctZ/Rh9my/y7UhJaSpfRMXQ2bTd2RUvPrUnANLIguO1kjxp+4C5J Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0+baM3MMS3yvEjuFHsruJA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: myMQNxpFTiGAqls9Hm5VVA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11185"; a="34824749" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,204,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="34824749" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2024 05:56:24 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Kcq00DTNSRi7kb1B3Ot7/A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: hGncXF15RLS/t5l/n59BHA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,204,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="96361175" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2024 05:56:23 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1smC28-00000005Omw-36OX; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 15:56:20 +0300 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 15:56:20 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linus Walleij , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Th=E9o?= Lebrun , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: nomadik: Use string_choices API instead of ternary operator Message-ID: References: <20240826095723.1421065-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240826095723.1421065-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 12:57:23PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Use modern string_choices API instead of manually determining the > output using ternary operator. Linus, do you have any comment on this? I had sent two patches of similar changes (different drivers, thoug), one got applied and this is not. Anything should I do about it? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko