From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Markku Ahvenjärvi" <mankku@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
janne.karhunen@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: nVMX: update VPPR on vmlaunch/vmresume
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:18:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zu0vvRyCyUaQ2S2a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240920080012.74405-2-mankku@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024, Markku Ahvenjärvi wrote:
> Running certain hypervisors under KVM on VMX suffered L1 hangs after
> launching a nested guest. The external interrupts were not processed on
> vmlaunch/vmresume due to stale VPPR, and L2 guest would resume without
> allowing L1 hypervisor to process the events.
>
> The patch ensures VPPR to be updated when checking for pending
> interrupts.
This is architecturally incorrect, PPR isn't refreshed at VM-Enter.
Aha! I wonder if the missing PPR update is due to the nested VM-Enter path
directly clearing IRR when processing a posted interrupt.
On top of https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next, does this fix things?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index a8e7bc04d9bf..a8255c6f0d51 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -3731,7 +3731,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
kvm_apic_has_interrupt(vcpu) == vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv) {
vmx->nested.pi_pending = true;
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
- kvm_apic_clear_irr(vcpu, vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv);
+ kvm_apic_ack_interrupt(vcpu, vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv);
}
/* Hide L1D cache contents from the nested guest. */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-20 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 7:59 [PATCH 0/1] KVM: nVMX: update VPPR on vmlaunch/vmresume Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-09-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-09-20 8:18 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-09-20 12:40 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-02 12:42 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-02 15:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-02 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-02 17:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 11:29 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-10 11:00 ` Chao Gao
2024-10-14 10:57 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-16 18:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-17 13:27 ` Chao Gao
2024-10-17 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zu0vvRyCyUaQ2S2a@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=janne.karhunen@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mankku@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox