public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp: Limit time setting of PTP clocks
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:00:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuA08ew8aNb8P_n4@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zt8YyCrQL1XBQk0g@hoboy.vegasvil.org>

On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 08:48:24AM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> > index c56cd0f63909..bd7c5f534be6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> > @@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ static int ptp_clock_settime(struct posix_clock *pc, const struct timespec64 *tp
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (!timespec64_valid_settod(tp))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Why not perform the test earlier, in SYSCALL_DEFINE2(clock_settime, ...) ?

It would be more code as there are also the 32-bit compat variants of
the functions. The adjtime function would probably need to handle
missing gettime.

The limit would apply to all clocks, not just PTP clocks. If nothing
else, I suspect it would change returned errors for other clocks
trying to set the an unacceptable timespec value.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar


      reply	other threads:[~2024-09-10 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-09 13:09 [PATCH] ptp: Limit time setting of PTP clocks Miroslav Lichvar
2024-09-09 15:48 ` Richard Cochran
2024-09-10 12:00   ` Miroslav Lichvar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZuA08ew8aNb8P_n4@localhost \
    --to=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox