From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-x86 tree with the kvm6390 tree
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 07:39:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuGrkqwbBt2V0dJL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240911154328.0ad45c38@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-x86 tree got a conflict in:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
>
> between commit:
>
> 011901fc2224 ("selftests: kvm: s390: Add s390x ucontrol test suite with hpage test")
>
> from the kvm6390 tree and commit:
>
> 9d15171f39f0 ("KVM: selftests: Explicitly include committed one-off assets in .gitignore")
>
> from the kvm-x86 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter includes the former) and can carry the fix as
Ya, I'll make sure to note this in my pull request to Paolo, but I don't think
there's anything else to be done at this time.
Thanks Stephen!
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-11 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 5:43 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-x86 tree with the kvm6390 tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-11 14:39 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuGrkqwbBt2V0dJL@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox