From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99CED186E2C; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726219898; cv=none; b=YICBuq2NXAFsHVRKAIbExKJaLdyOtXh4OtzuswI8xh3bO2CFaZQaJktLJrUUqI+CQGZAaFufDCTN9e///WmjtE6ovZCnBG2zY8ofv+fvAtehtaH5MtpS2KghXu0MhQffysulZiHBuaiElXMLILYbKsgNimBQm2yzPay+MQhHsZU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726219898; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ekuvhHPYKge6NJXqTlLTzq+obp+wVk2Rpy5JOBXtHrw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QBAFBSsrG4g0HBZF/1mASgMg7qG+SuKKH4G/pqcls/Ig6hUUkicoSZjB4as97mQS+SYIxKGHZyzxcR8EuWEvckt0m3+eQttvYiB3ojn7c/eDbBWzSEOba97EzjiLuisldoghKb9lkmJs6OwM3wfYgQ4O7/Ta8OiybA55+gAm5sM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=FbG2uPdD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="FbG2uPdD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726219897; x=1757755897; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ekuvhHPYKge6NJXqTlLTzq+obp+wVk2Rpy5JOBXtHrw=; b=FbG2uPdDONMKeV2L56ZvZzBdRFxxsYwZPY9wnXPGAXQ9dzhIi7nU1g+u UvoiG/1ZS4HL6AmxaJ0MS1sC5DpoWMLq+iVYo8I9MlQRBe3mhuxhA9IT/ a1+jS/ZPHWLKPR5ebW90/yqrY2dV1KIakz7oJfXSMPfBqdIBqkPQWO9mc YKEN8PtIVyeaR2g1xhpRaF5oPFpFZ+4nK6ocBKYv3CBKAhh1+xahfEHZ/ SNLpTUm+61MkfNcPCx3habbvnz0aWkQsqjIyJQgMhUAzjj1XymJZ7LKMg Wu9c5RAMo1vMH+slRnVnsR220fsgMc8z+KpKttPZeoh6AJrrVudsfxoad g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: h7bmUtHjQ52xE03+xCoUHQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: iTW0e8O1TTOaiMgR7n+MkA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11193"; a="47628280" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,225,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="47628280" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Sep 2024 02:31:36 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zDnRAEnSS4OgiTvHoCvpOQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: IE1cu8MSSOy0Xr0N/6OfKQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,225,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="67616819" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Sep 2024 02:31:34 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sp2eJ-00000008FAi-2Iib; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:31:31 +0300 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:31:31 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Hans de Goede Cc: Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: light: ltr501: Drop most likely fake ACPI ID Message-ID: References: <20240911212202.2892451-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:51:09PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 9/11/24 11:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The commit in question does not proove that ACPI ID exists. > > Quite likely it was a cargo cult addition while doint that > > for DT-based enumeration. Drop most likely fake ACPI ID. > > > > Googling for LTERxxxx gives no useful results in regard to DSDT. > > Moreover, there is no "LTER" official vendor ID in the registry. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > > Thanks, patch looks good to me: Have you grepped over your collection of real DSDTs? > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko