* of alloc_canxl_skb
@ 2024-09-13 14:03 Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2024-09-13 19:51 ` Oliver Hartkopp
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert @ 2024-09-13 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: socketcan, mkl; +Cc: linux-can, linux-kernel
Hi Oliver, Marc,
I'm doing some deadcode hunting and noticed that
alloc_canxl_skb in drivers/net/can/dev/skb.c
looks unused in the main kernel tree; is that expected?
I see it was added back in 2022 by
fb08cba12b52 ("can: canxl: update CAN infrastructure for CAN XL frames")
I know almost exactly nothing about CAN, so I thought it best
to ask!
Dave
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: of alloc_canxl_skb
2024-09-13 14:03 of alloc_canxl_skb Dr. David Alan Gilbert
@ 2024-09-13 19:51 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2024-09-13 20:05 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Hartkopp @ 2024-09-13 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dr. David Alan Gilbert, mkl; +Cc: linux-can, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1385 bytes --]
Hi David,
On 13.09.24 16:03, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> I'm doing some deadcode hunting and noticed that
>
> alloc_canxl_skb in drivers/net/can/dev/skb.c
>
> looks unused in the main kernel tree; is that expected?
> I see it was added back in 2022 by
> fb08cba12b52 ("can: canxl: update CAN infrastructure for CAN XL frames")
>
> I know almost exactly nothing about CAN, so I thought it best
> to ask!
I created some slides so that you can get an introduction to the
different CAN protocols CAN CC (aka Classical CAN), CAN FD and CAN XL:
https://github.com/linux-can/can-doc/tree/master/presentations
The introduction of the CAN XL support lead to some clean up and rework
also for the former alloc_can_skb() and alloc_canfd_skb() helpers.
The function is currently not in use in net/can/raw.c as it is only
needed when a CAN XL frame is received from read hardware. But the patch
also contains the definition of ETH_P_CANXL to already handle CAN XL
frames properly inside the Linux kernel and e.g. for WireShark 4.4.
There are currently some CAN XL IP cores in development (see attached
picture with an FPGA based IP core) and I am working on the kernel
infrastructure (e.g. bitrate configuration enhancements) on this board.
So alloc_canxl_skb() is already in use on my desk and there will be some
more stuff showing up soon ;-)
Best regards,
Oliver
[-- Attachment #2: DE1_SoC_FPGA_working_setup.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 236146 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: of alloc_canxl_skb
2024-09-13 19:51 ` Oliver Hartkopp
@ 2024-09-13 20:05 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert @ 2024-09-13 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Hartkopp; +Cc: mkl, linux-can, linux-kernel
* Oliver Hartkopp (socketcan@hartkopp.net) wrote:
> Hi David,
Hi Oliver,
> On 13.09.24 16:03, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> > I'm doing some deadcode hunting and noticed that
> >
> > alloc_canxl_skb in drivers/net/can/dev/skb.c
> >
> > looks unused in the main kernel tree; is that expected?
> > I see it was added back in 2022 by
> > fb08cba12b52 ("can: canxl: update CAN infrastructure for CAN XL frames")
> >
> > I know almost exactly nothing about CAN, so I thought it best
> > to ask!
>
> I created some slides so that you can get an introduction to the different
> CAN protocols CAN CC (aka Classical CAN), CAN FD and CAN XL:
>
> https://github.com/linux-can/can-doc/tree/master/presentations
Thanks!
> The introduction of the CAN XL support lead to some clean up and rework also
> for the former alloc_can_skb() and alloc_canfd_skb() helpers.
>
> The function is currently not in use in net/can/raw.c as it is only needed
> when a CAN XL frame is received from read hardware. But the patch also
> contains the definition of ETH_P_CANXL to already handle CAN XL frames
> properly inside the Linux kernel and e.g. for WireShark 4.4.
>
> There are currently some CAN XL IP cores in development (see attached
> picture with an FPGA based IP core) and I am working on the kernel
> infrastructure (e.g. bitrate configuration enhancements) on this board. So
> alloc_canxl_skb() is already in use on my desk and there will be some more
> stuff showing up soon ;-)
OK, great - I won't try and deadcode it then!
Thanks again for the reply,
Dave
> Best regards,
> Oliver
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-13 20:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-13 14:03 of alloc_canxl_skb Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2024-09-13 19:51 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2024-09-13 20:05 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox