Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] tee: amdtee: Use %pUl printk() format specifier to print GUIDs

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:38:08PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 01:38:27PM +0530, Rijo Thomas wrote:
> > On 9/13/2024 2:59 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 07:50:08AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 10:41 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > >> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Replace the custom approach with the %pUl printk() format specifier.
> > >>> No functional change intended.
> > > 
> > >> Thanks, the patch looks like a nice simplificatrion.
> > > 
> > > Thank you for the review.
> > > 
> > >> Rijo, Devaraj, does this work for you?
> > > 
> > > Yes, please test, because seems others use uuid_t (UUID BE) for TEE,
> > > but in this driver IIUC it's guid_t (UUID LE).
> > 
> > No, this does not work for us. I tested this patch, it does not work as expected.
> > 
> > %pUl gives output in uuid format (%08x-%04x-%04x-%02x%02x-%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x).
> > But, what we need, is a name with the format %08x-%04x-%04x-%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x.
> > 
> > Endian-ness is not an issue here. uuid generates name with 4 hypens (-).
> > While, in our TA naming we are using 3 hyphens (-).
> 
> Ah, good catch! Can somebody add a comment there to explain that this uses
> non-standard human-readable representation of GUID/UUID?
> 
> P.S. Thank you for testing!

Alternatively we may get rid of that hyphen. I can send a patch.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko